Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Detecting malingered memory deficits with the Recognition Memory Test

G L Iverson1, M D Franzen

  • 1University of British Columbia, Department of Psychiatry, Vancouver, Canada.

Brain Injury
|May 1, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

All-cause mortality and suicide after pediatric traumatic brain injury: a 20-year nationwide study in Finland.

Public health·2024
Same author

Usefulness of Video Review of Possible Concussions in National Youth Rugby League.

International journal of sports medicine·2016
Same author

A Video Analysis of Use of the New 'Concussion Interchange Rule' in the National Rugby League.

International journal of sports medicine·2016
Same author

A pilot study of active rehabilitation for adolescents who are slow to recover from sport-related concussion.

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports·2015
Same author

King-Devick test normative reference values for professional male ice hockey players.

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports·2014
Same author

Contributions of neuroimaging, balance testing, electrophysiology and blood markers to the assessment of sport-related concussion.

British journal of sports medicine·2009
Same journal

Patient outcomes post self-inflicted traumatic brain injury during the acute phase.

Brain injury·2026
Same journal

Memory alterations over a football season are dependent on athlete position-type and prior concussion history.

Brain injury·2026
Same journal

Managing concussions in New Zealand secondary schools: Let's take it seriously.

Brain injury·2026
Same journal

Stacking machine learning model for risk stratification of acute respiratory distress syndrome after traumatic brain injury: a multicenter retrospective study.

Brain injury·2026
Same journal

Low-intensity focused ultrasound for a child with chronic disorders of consciousness: a promising case report.

Brain injury·2026
Same journal

The relationship between concussion and subsequent upper body musculoskeletal injury in NFL players.

Brain injury·2026
See all related articles

The Recognition Memory Test effectively identifies malingered memory deficits. This study shows the RMT accurately distinguishes between genuine and feigned memory impairments in patients and simulates malingering.

Area of Science:

  • Neuropsychology
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Forensic Psychology

Background:

  • Malingered memory deficits pose a challenge in neuropsychological evaluations.
  • Accurate identification of malingering is crucial for appropriate diagnosis and treatment.
  • The Recognition Memory Test (RMT) is a potential tool for detecting feigned cognitive impairments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the Recognition Memory Test's (RMT) effectiveness in identifying malingered memory deficits.
  • To determine if RMT scores can differentiate between genuine memory impairment, non-impaired individuals, and those feigning deficits.
  • To assess the RMT's utility as a marker for malingering in clinical and research settings.

Main Methods:

  • Sixty participants were studied: 40 patients undergoing neuropsychological evaluation and 20 university undergraduates instructed to feign memory deficits.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants included memory-impaired patients, memory-nonimpaired patients, and a control group simulating malingering.
  • Discriminant function analyses were performed using two RMT scores to predict group membership.

    • Main Results:

    • University students instructed to malinger performed significantly worse on the RMT than both patient groups.
    • Discriminant function analysis achieved a 100% correct classification rate for initial group assignment.
    • Cross-validation of the discriminant function model yielded a high correct classification rate of 96.7%.

    Conclusions:

    • The Recognition Memory Test (RMT) demonstrates high efficacy as a marker for malingered memory deficits.
    • RMT scores can reliably differentiate individuals feigning memory impairment from those with genuine deficits.
    • The findings support the use of the RMT in neuropsychological assessments to detect malingering.