Construct validation of the Hoensbroeck Disability Scale for Brain Injury in acquired brain injury rehabilitation
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 30, 2026

Detecting Behavioral Deficits in Rats After Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: January 30, 2018
M Torenbeek1, G J van der Heijden, L P de Witte
1Samenwerkende Revalidatie Centra Limburg, Rehabilitation Center Hoensbroeck, The Netherlands.
Insights
The Hoensbroeck Disability Scale for Brain Injury (HDSB) effectively measures brain injury disability at one point. However, its ability to track changes over time requires further study.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Clinical Assessment
Background:
- Acquired brain injury (ABI) presents significant disability challenges.
- Accurate assessment tools are crucial for rehabilitation and patient management.
- The Hoensbroeck Disability Scale for Brain Injury (HDSB) is a potential tool for evaluating ABI-related disability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the construct validity of the HDSB by comparing it with the established Disability Rating Scale (DRS).
- To assess the HDSB's ability to measure changes in disability over time in patients with brain injuries.
Main Methods:
- The HDSB and DRS were administered to 33 brain-injured patients during post-acute rehabilitation at admission, 6 weeks, and discharge.
- Correlations were calculated between HDSB and DRS scores at each time point.
- Longitudinal construct validity was examined by correlating changes in scores over time.
- Sensitivity to change was compared using effect sizes.
Main Results:
- HDSB subscales showed high correlations with the DRS at all assessment points, supporting concurrent validity.
- The correlation between changes in HDSB and DRS scores was moderate but in the expected direction.
- The HDSB demonstrated lower sensitivity to change over a 6-week period compared to the DRS.
Conclusions:
- The HDSB is a valid instrument for assessing the disability of acquired brain injury patients at a single point in time.
- The HDSB's utility in measuring longitudinal changes in disability requires further investigation.
- Future research should focus on refining the HDSB for tracking recovery and functional changes.
Purpose:
To evaluate the construct validity of the Hoensbroeck Disability Scale for Brain Injury (HDSB) against the Disability Rating Scale (DRS).
Methods:
The HDSB was correlated with the DRS at admission, 6 weeks later and at discharge in 33 brain injured patients during post-acute rehabilitation. Next, to study the longitudinal construct validity of the HDSB the mean changes in score of the HDSB and the DRS were correlated. Finally, the sensitivity to change over a 6-week period was evaluated by comparison of the effect sizes of the HDSB scores with the DRS scores.
Results:
The HDSB subscales correlate high and in the expected direction with the DRS at all three points in time. The correlation of the changes between HDSB and DRS is moderate, but in the expected direction. The sensitivity to change in time of the HDSB is lower than that of the DRS.
Conclusions:
This study supports the validity of the HDSB as an instrument to describe the disability of acquired brain injury patients at a single point in time. Its ability to measure changes in disability over time is questionable and needs further investigation.

