Related Experiment Videos

RAD9 and RAD24 define two additive, interacting branches of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway in budding yeast

M A de la Torre-Ruiz1, C M Green, N F Lowndes

  • 1Imperial Cancer Research Fund, Clare Hall Laboratories, CDC Laboratory, South Mimms, Herts EN6 3LD, UK.

The EMBO Journal
|June 20, 1998
PubMed

Insights

DNA damage response in yeast requires RAD9 and RAD24/RAD17/MEC3 checkpoint genes. These genes function in parallel pathways converging on MEC1 and RAD53, with antagonism between RAD9 and RAD24 impacting DNA repair.

Area of Science:

  • Cellular and Molecular Biology
  • Genetics and Genomics
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • RAD9 and RAD24/RAD17/MEC3 are key components of the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway in budding yeast.
  • These genes are known to function upstream of MEC1 and RAD53, crucial for cell cycle checkpoint control after DNA damage.
  • Previous work established RAD9's role in the transcriptional induction of the DDR.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate the precise roles and genetic interactions of RAD9 and the RAD24 epistasis group in DNA damage signaling and checkpoint control.
  • To investigate the requirement of these checkpoint genes for the transcriptional induction of the DDR.
  • To determine the relationship between RAD9, RAD24/RAD17/MEC3, MEC1, and RAD53 in DNA damage response pathways.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of G1/S and G2/M checkpoint delays in yeast mutants after UV irradiation.
  • Assessment of transcriptional induction of the DNA damage regulon (DDR) in various mutant strains.
  • Overexpression of checkpoint proteins to examine G2/M checkpoint and UV sensitivity.
  • Study of Rad53 modification and activation following DNA damage.

Main Results:

  • Efficient DDR induction requires RAD9, RAD24/RAD17, and MEC3; residual induction in single mutants is absent in rad9Δ-rad24Δ double mutants.
  • RAD9 and the RAD24 epistasis group operate on separate, additive branches converging on MEC1 and RAD53.
  • MEC3 functions downstream of RAD24/RAD17, and specific antagonism exists between RAD9 and RAD24 in the transcriptional response.
  • Genetic interactions were further supported by Rad53 modification studies, with evidence for Rad53 bypass under certain conditions.

Conclusions:

  • RAD9 and the RAD24/RAD17/MEC3 complex are essential for robust DNA damage checkpoint activation and DDR induction in yeast.
  • These pathways converge additively on MEC1 and RAD53, highlighting a complex signaling network.
  • Antagonistic interactions between RAD9 and RAD24 reveal intricate regulatory mechanisms within the DDR, influencing checkpoint control and DNA repair efficiency.

Related Concept Videos