Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Devices for endometrial sampling. A comparison

D R Mishell1, A M Kaunitz

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles County, USA.

The Journal of Reproductive Medicine
|June 6, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Metabolic and cardiovascular effects of TX-001HR in menopausal women with vasomotor symptoms.

Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society·2019
Same author

Circulating androgen levels before and after oophorectomy in premenopausal and postmenopausal women.

Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society·2019
Same author

Vasomotor symptoms and the risk of incident venous thrombosis in postmenopausal women.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2018
Same author

Balancing the efficacy and safety of misoprostol: a meta-analysis comparing 25 versus 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol for the induction of labour.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2014
Same author

Management of pain associated with the insertion of intrauterine contraceptives.

Human reproduction update·2013
Same author

Endometrial effect of progesterone delivered by vaginal rings in estrogen-treated postmenopausal women.

Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society·2010
Same journal

Elective Procedures in Obstetrics and Gynecology During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The Journal of reproductive medicine·2022
Same journal

Choriocarcinoma in Situ in a Partial Hydatidiform Mole A: Case Report.

The Journal of reproductive medicine·2018
Same journal

Isolated Recurrent Hematotrachelos After Abdominal Myomectomy A Case Report.

The Journal of reproductive medicine·2018
Same journal

Live Birth from Electively Cryopreserved Oocytes: A Feasible Option for Couples Opposed to Embryo Cryopreservation A Case Report.

The Journal of reproductive medicine·2018
Same journal

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Ejaculation Failure on the Day of Operation Among Chinese Males Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technique Treatments.

The Journal of reproductive medicine·2018
Same journal

Efficacy and Safety of Perioperative Use of Epinephrine for Laparoscopic Myomectomy in Infertile Women with Symptomatic Solitary Intramural Uterine Fibroids A Randomized Clinical Trial.

The Journal of reproductive medicine·2018
See all related articles

The GynoSampler and Pipelle endometrial sampling devices showed similar diagnostic performance and patient comfort. However, physicians found the GynoSampler easier to use in clinical practice.

Area of Science:

  • Gynecology
  • Medical Devices
  • Clinical Performance Evaluation

Background:

  • Endometrial sampling is crucial for diagnosing gynecological conditions.
  • Comparing the efficacy and usability of different sampling devices is essential for optimizing patient care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the clinical performance of the GynoSampler and Pipelle endometrial sampling devices.
  • To evaluate specimen adequacy, patient discomfort, and ease of use for both devices.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study involving 100 female patients across two clinical centers.
  • Each patient underwent two endometrial biopsies, one with the GynoSampler and one with the Pipelle during a single visit.
  • Key outcomes assessed included specimen adequacy, patient-reported pain, and physician-reported ease of use.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Both devices achieved high specimen adequacy rates, with over 90% of samples sufficient for diagnosis.
  • Patient discomfort levels were comparable between the GynoSampler and Pipelle.
  • Physicians reported significantly greater ease of use with the GynoSampler compared to the Pipelle (P < .05).

Conclusions:

  • The GynoSampler and Pipelle demonstrate comparable diagnostic performance and patient tolerability.
  • The GynoSampler offers an advantage in terms of ease of use for healthcare providers.
  • These findings suggest the GynoSampler may be a preferred option for endometrial sampling procedures.