Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Using peer, self, and counselor ratings to evaluate treatment progress

M Czuchry1, D F Dansereau, T L Sia

  • 1Institute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth 76129, USA.

Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
|June 13, 1998
PubMed
Summary

Peer ratings effectively supplement traditional assessments for evaluating drug abuse treatment progress. This method, alongside self and counselor ratings, offers valuable insights into client participation and outcomes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The attribute selection process in pattern perception: The effect of constraint redundancy and stimulus exposure time on the classification of spatially represented Markov patterns.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

Comment on "nonresponse and selection bias in treatment follow-up studies".

Substance use & misuse·2002
Same author

The use of node-link mapping in the chemical dependency treatment of adolescents.

Journal of drug education·2001
Same author

Relationships between counseling rapport and drug abuse treatment outcomes.

Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)·2001
Same author

Predictors of program completion for women in residential substance abuse treatment.

The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse·2001
Same author

Modeling treatment process and outcomes.

Addiction (Abingdon, England)·2001

Area of Science:

  • Addiction research
  • Psychological assessment
  • Treatment outcome evaluation

Background:

  • Effective evaluation of drug abuse treatment requires diverse assessment methods.
  • Existing measures may benefit from supplementary data sources.
  • Understanding client engagement is crucial for treatment success.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the utility of peer ratings as a method for assessing treatment progress in residential drug abuse facilities.
  • To compare peer ratings with self and counselor ratings of client "working the program."
  • To determine if peer ratings correlate with treatment outcomes and individual differences.

Main Methods:

  • A peer rating methodology was employed to evaluate treatment progress.
  • Data were collected from 381 probationers in a four-month residential drug abuse facility.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Client self-ratings, peer ratings, and counselor ratings were compared.

    • Main Results:

    • Peer and counselor ratings demonstrated higher correlation with each other than with client self-ratings.
    • Both peer and self-ratings identified differences between enhanced and standard counseling programs.
    • Peer ratings were associated with individual difference measures and predicted end-term participation and sobriety.

    Conclusions:

    • Peer ratings serve as a valuable supplementary indicator for evaluating drug abuse treatment progress.
    • The findings support integrating peer feedback into comprehensive treatment assessment strategies.
    • Peer assessment offers a reliable method for gauging client engagement and predicting treatment success.