Related Experiment Videos
Back to the future: community involvement in the Healthy Start Program
E M Howell1, B Devaney, M McCormick
1Harvard University, USA.
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
|May 5, 1998
Summary
Community involvement in the Healthy Start initiative to reduce infant mortality utilized two models: service consortium and community empowerment. Achieving meaningful community engagement proved challenging and labor-intensive, impacting program goals and operations.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Community Health Initiatives
- Health Disparities Research
Background:
- Infant mortality rates remain disproportionately high in certain communities.
- The Healthy Start initiative aims to reduce infant mortality through community-based interventions.
- Understanding effective community involvement strategies is crucial for program success.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine how community involvement is integrated into the Healthy Start initiative.
- To identify and differentiate the models of community involvement employed.
- To analyze the challenges and lessons learned from implementing community involvement.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative study based on site visits to fifteen original Healthy Start project areas.
- Analysis of community involvement strategies, categorizing them into distinct models.
- Identification of key challenges and outcomes associated with community engagement.
Main Results:
- Two primary models of community involvement were identified: service consortium and community empowerment.
- The service consortium model involves local providers and governmental representatives in planning.
- The community empowerment model engages neighborhood groups, community organizations, and residents as lay workers, alongside economic development initiatives.
Conclusions:
- Community involvement in Healthy Start faced challenges, including unclear purpose, difficulty engaging residents, and labor intensity.
- Monetary incentives were more effective for involving providers than residents.
- Community involvement can conflict with operational efficiency and may alter original program goals, potentially slowing development.