Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dental iatrogenesis, Part 2

H R Stanley

    Dentistry Today
    |February 1, 1995
    PubMed
    Summary

    Dental material biocompatibility testing reveals high-speed cutting and incremental light-cured composites minimize pulp irritation. Proper use of bonding agents protects the dental pulp from iatrogenic damage.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Pulp capping with a modified bioglass formula (#A68-modified).

    American journal of dentistry·2001
    Same author

    Criteria for standardizing and increasing credibility of direct pulp capping studies.

    American journal of dentistry·1998
    Same author

    The disastrous effects of the "total etch" technique in vital pulp capping in primates.

    American journal of dentistry·1998
    Same author

    The road to pulp biology research: a personal odyssey.

    Journal of dental research·1998
    Same author

    Adherence of "stuck" restorations to demineralized dentin following use of experimental primers.

    The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·1997
    Same author

    Using 45S5 bioglass cones as endosseous ridge maintenance implants to prevent alveolar ridge resorption: a 5-year evaluation.

    The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·1997

    Area of Science:

    • Dental materials science
    • Biocompatibility testing
    • Restorative dentistry

    Background:

    • Dental procedures can cause iatrogenic damage to the pulp and dentin.
    • Biocompatibility testing is crucial for evaluating dental materials and techniques.
    • Minimizing pulp responses is essential for successful dental treatments.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To assess the biocompatibility of various dental materials and techniques.
    • To evaluate pulp and dentinal responses to different restorative procedures.
    • To provide evidence-based recommendations for reducing iatrogenic effects in dentistry.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparison of high-speed versus low-speed tooth cutting techniques with air-water coolant.
    • Evaluation of pulp responses to pressure during restorative material placement.
    • Assessment of chemically self-cured versus visible light-cured resin composites.
    • Analysis of pulp irritation from luting cements and conditioning/bonding agents.

    Main Results:

    • High-speed cutting is superior to low-speed cutting for minimizing pulp response.
    • Pressure during material placement intensifies pulp responses.
    • Visible light-cured composites show less pulp response than chemically self-cured composites.
    • Most cements are irritating to the pulp; bonding agents offer protection.

    Conclusions:

    • Dental clinicians should prioritize techniques that minimize pulp irritation and iatrogenic damage.
    • Material selection, such as using incremental light-cured composites, is key to biocompatibility.
    • Careful application of dental materials and agents can significantly reduce adverse pulp responses.

    Related Experiment Videos