Home flow rates in evaluation of lower urinary tract symptoms in men

We wanted to determine if 5-second home flow rates can be used in the evaluation in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Fifty previously untreated men with LUTS were evaluated by history and physical examination, international prostate symptom score (IPSS) questionnaire, and two methods of uroflowmetry. Each participant underwent three formal uroflow measurements using the Dantec UD5500 Mk2 machine and subjective 5-second home uroflow measurements twice daily for 7 days. The reliability of each test as well as correlation coefficients between the two methods of uroflowmetry were determined. The reliability for the average of the 14 home flow rates was 0.99 and the reliability for any single home flow was 0.82. Reliability for the average of three uroflows in measuring Qmax, Qave, flow times, and volume are 0.91, 0.91, 0.86, and 0.79, respectively. If single measurements are used, the values are 0.77, 0.78, 0.68, and 0.56. Home flow average is significantly different from Qmax and Qave (p < .001). No significant correlation was found between any of the uroflowmetry measurements or home flow average and IPSS or bother score. Home flows rates and uroflowmetry are reliable tests. There is a weak correlation between average home flows and Qmax and Qave. The greatest use of home flow rates probably lies in follow-up of patients who had either medical or surgical intervention for LUTS.