Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Syndrome designations

M M Cohen

    Journal of Medical Genetics
    |August 1, 1976
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Syndrome names are crucial for data collection, reflecting phenotypic spectra, natural histories, and inheritance patterns. Reviewing various naming methods reveals that each has advantages and disadvantages.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Confirmation of an oroacral pattern of anomalies: a disruption?

    American journal of medical genetics·1992
    Same author

    Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome.

    American journal of medical genetics·1992
    Same author

    Perspectives on holoprosencephaly: Part II. Central nervous system, craniofacial anatomy, syndrome commentary, diagnostic approach, and experimental studies.

    Journal of craniofacial genetics and developmental biology·1992
    Same author

    Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the anaesthetist's point of view.

    Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie·1992
    Same author

    Discovery and expository methods in teaching visual consonant and word identification.

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1992
    Same author

    Beare-Stevenson cutis gyrata syndrome.

    American journal of medical genetics·1992
    Same journal

    Longest surviving patient with a homozygous splice-altering <i>EGFR</i> pathogenic variant presenting with skin autoinflammation and a Bartter-like salt-losing tubulopathy.

    Journal of medical genetics·2026
    Same journal

    Functional characterisation and pathological significance of variants of <i>MEF2C</i> promoter in tetralogy of Fallot.

    Journal of medical genetics·2026
    Same journal

    Identification of biallelic loss-of-function <i>PREP</i> variants in three individuals with syndromic intellectual disability.

    Journal of medical genetics·2026
    Same journal

    Inherited retinal disease genes with dual inheritance patterns: insights from the IRD-PT registry.

    Journal of medical genetics·2026
    Same journal

    Interpreting <i>TP53</i> variants: somatic mosaicism and <i>ERCC6L2</i>-driven clonal evolution.

    Journal of medical genetics·2026
    Same journal

    Review of estimates of birth incidence and population prevalence over time and between countries of the rare neurodevelopmental condition Prader-Willi syndrome.

    Journal of medical genetics·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Genetics
    • Clinical Syndromology
    • Nomenclature

    Background:

    • Syndrome designations are vital for organizing and collecting clinical data.
    • Accurate syndrome naming aids in understanding disease characteristics and inheritance.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review and analyze various methods used for naming newly delineated syndromes.
    • To discuss the advantages and disadvantages associated with each syndrome nomenclature system.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review of existing syndrome naming conventions.
    • Comparative analysis of different nomenclature approaches.

    Main Results:

    • Syndrome names convey phenotypic spectra, natural histories, and inheritance/recurrence risks.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Common naming methods include basic defect, eponyms, striking features, acronyms, numerals, geographic terms, or combinations.
  • No single nomenclature system is universally faultless.
  • Conclusions:

    • Syndrome nomenclature systems offer significant benefits for clinical data collection and research.
    • Each naming method presents unique challenges and limitations that require careful consideration.