Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Retrieval processes that produce interference in modified forced-choice recognition tests

C C Chandler1, G J Gargano

  • 1Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman 99164-4820, USA. chandler@wsunix.wsu.edu

Memory & Cognition
|May 19, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Predictors of children's and adolescents' risk perception.

Journal of pediatric psychology·2005
Same author

Item-specific interference caused by cue-dependent forgetting.

Memory & cognition·1995
Same author

Studying related pictures can reduce accuracy, but increase confidence, in a modified recognition test.

Memory & cognition·1994
Same author

Directed forgetting and posthypnotic amnesia: information processing and social contexts.

Journal of personality and social psychology·1989
Same author

Tetanus.

Lancet (London, England)·1958
Same author

A source of respiratory obstruction.

Anaesthesia·1958
Same journal

The properties of personal semantics.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Music enhances associative generalization: Evidence from a memory integration task.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Video, text, and memory: An emotional verbal overshadowing effect.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

Memory retrieval involves distinct processes that can be disrupted by similar or recent information. Understanding these retrieval mechanisms improves recall accuracy and reduces interference effects in recognition tasks.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Memory Research
  • Experimental Psychology

Background:

  • Recognition memory can be impaired when retrieval cues activate multiple stored memory traces.
  • Interference effects, where one memory trace hinders the retrieval of another, are a key challenge in understanding recognition.
  • Distinguishing between similar and recent memory traces is crucial for accurate recall.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the distinct retrieval processes underlying human memory recognition.
  • To examine how interference effects differ based on the timing and similarity of competing memory traces.
  • To identify factors influencing the dominance of specific retrieval processes during recognition tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized forced-choice recognition tests to measure interference effects.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Designed experiments manipulating the presentation phase (study vs. test) of target and competitor items.
  • Varied the similarity between target and competitor items (e.g., visually similar objects, semantically related word pairs).

    • Main Results:

    • Experiment 1 demonstrated impaired discrimination between temporally and contextually similar traces when competitors were studied, not tested.
    • Experiments 2 and 3 revealed a blocking process where recent competitors (presented at test) interfered more than those studied.
    • This blocking effect occurred irrespective of competitor similarity to the target item.

    Conclusions:

    • Evidence supports the existence of at least two distinct memory retrieval processes.
    • The relative contribution of each retrieval process depends on item representation and retrieval cue characteristics.
    • Understanding these processes is vital for optimizing memory recall and minimizing recognition errors.