Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The Little Rock weave

G W Barone1, H J Broussard, J W Webb

  • 1Department of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock 72205, USA.

The American Surgeon
|May 20, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Field investigation of an outbreak of diphtheria.

British medical journal·2010
Same author

Pretransplant evaluation of a patient with acute intermittent porphyria.

Progress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.)·2002
Same author

St John's wort: a hidden risk for transplant patients.

Progress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.)·2002
Same author

Polyoma viral infection in renal transplantation: the role of immunosuppressive therapy.

Clinical transplantation·2001
Same author

"General surgical pearls" for the anterior exposure of vertebral fractures.

The American surgeon·2001
Same author

The Rumel technique for lateral thoracotomy closure.

The Journal of cardiovascular surgery·2001
Same journal

Complete Response of Merkel Cell Carcinoma to Immunotherapy and Single-Fraction Radiotherapy Following Severe COVID-19 Infection: A Case Report and Review of Immune Mechanism.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Perioperative Acute Myocardial Infarction in Non-Cardiac Operations: A National Analysis.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Outcomes of Completion Cholecystectomy: Association With Patient Comorbidity in a National Database.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Building the Conversation: Editorial Stewardship in Contemporary Surgical Publishing.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Musculoskeletal Pain in Surgeons on Operating Days.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Splenectomy During Cytoreductive Surgery: Marker of Surgical Burden or Independent Predictor of Morbidity?

The American surgeon·2026
See all related articles

For abdominal wound closures, a modified interrupted suture technique offers safe and effective wound tension distribution. This method simplifies suturing, especially for challenging wounds, ensuring better surgical outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical technique
  • Wound closure
  • Abdominal surgery

Background:

  • Ongoing debate in surgical literature regarding running vs. interrupted sutures for abdominal wound closure.
  • Both techniques are generally considered safe for most abdominal wounds.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe a modified interrupted suture technique for abdominal wound closure.
  • To highlight the advantages of this technique, particularly for difficult wounds.

Main Methods:

  • Description of a modified interrupted suturing technique.
  • Focus on equal distribution of wound tension along the entire closure.
  • Emphasis on ease of suture tying.

Main Results:

  • The modified interrupted technique ensures uniform tension distribution, unlike traditional methods where tension concentrates on the last suture.

Related Experiment Videos

  • This technique simplifies the suturing process, reducing difficulty in managing wound edges.
  • Potential for improved outcomes in challenging abdominal wound closures.

    • Conclusions:

    • The modified interrupted suture technique is a valuable option for abdominal wound closure, especially in complex cases.
    • Offers improved wound tension management and ease of application compared to standard methods.