Related Experiment Videos
Does a screening questionnaire for essential tremor agree with the physician's examination?
1Department of Neurology, Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Neurology
|May 22, 1998
Summary
A 12-question interview for essential tremor (ET) showed moderate validity in screening for the condition. However, mild ET cases may screen negative, highlighting the need for examination in population studies.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Essential tremor (ET) diagnosis is often by interview due to practical constraints.
- Validating screening tools for ET is crucial for epidemiological research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the validity of a 12-item screening questionnaire for essential tremor (ET).
- To evaluate the questionnaire's correlation with clinical tremor severity and diagnostic outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A community-based study of 242 subjects (33 definite/probable ET, 54 possible ET, 155 normal).
- Subjects completed a 12-item ET screening interview and underwent a videotaped tremor examination.
- Neurologists rated tremor severity and assigned diagnoses based on videotaped examinations.
Main Results:
- A significant association was found between affirmative responses and tremor severity (r = 0.66, p < 0.01).
- The screening questionnaire demonstrated 73% sensitivity, 96% specificity, and 80% positive predictive value for probable/definite ET.
- Questionnaire responses correlated well with neurologic examination findings, though mild ET cases often screened negative.
Conclusions:
- The 12-item questionnaire has moderate validity for screening essential tremor (ET).
- Mild or asymptomatic ET cases may not be identified by the screening tool.
- Physical examination remains essential for comprehensive ET assessment in population and family studies.