Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methods of examining induced sputum: do differences matter?

J C Kips1, R A Peleman, R A Pauwels

  • 1Dept of Respiratory Diseases, University Hospital Ghent, Belgium.

The European Respiratory Journal
|May 22, 1998
PubMed
Summary

Induced sputum analysis is a valuable tool for assessing airway inflammation in asthma and COPD. Different sputum processing methods do not impact the reliability of results for cellular and soluble fractions.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effect of Theophylline on Endotoxin and Tumor Necrosis Factor Induced Airway Changes in an in vivo Animal Model.

International archives of allergy and immunology·2021
Same author

An overview of the safety of inhaled corticosteroids.

The International journal of risk & safety in medicine·2013
Same author

IntroductionReport of a workshop assessing the risks and benefits of inhaled anti-inflammatory treatment for asthma.

The International journal of risk & safety in medicine·2013
Same author

Bronchodilatory effects of aclidinium bromide, a long-acting muscarinic antagonist, in COPD patients.

Respiratory medicine·2010
Same author

Mycobacterium avium complex with a distinct clinical and iconographic presentation: the Lady Windermere syndrome.

Acta clinica Belgica·2006
Same author

Role of tumour necrosis factor-alpha receptor p75 in cigarette smoke-induced pulmonary inflammation and emphysema.

The European respiratory journal·2006

Area of Science:

  • Pulmonology
  • Respiratory Medicine
  • Clinical Diagnostics

Background:

  • Induced sputum analysis offers a non-invasive method for evaluating airway inflammation.
  • Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) are key conditions where this analysis is relevant.
  • Validation of induced sputum techniques requires understanding the impact of sample processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether different sputum processing methods affect the validity and reliability of induced sputum analysis.
  • To determine if the choice of processing technique influences the assessment of airway inflammation.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of two primary sputum processing techniques: selective viscid portion analysis versus whole expectorate (sputum plus saliva) analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of the cellular and soluble fractions of induced sputum samples processed by both methods.

    • Main Results:

    • Both selective viscid portion processing and whole expectorate processing yield valid and reliable data.
    • The composition of cellular and soluble fractions in induced sputum is consistently represented by both methods.
    • Differences in sputum examination methods do not compromise the data quality.

    Conclusions:

    • The utility of induced sputum analysis for assessing airway inflammation is robust across different processing techniques.
    • Clinicians can confidently use induced sputum analysis regardless of the specific processing method employed.
    • Further standardization may not be necessary regarding these two processing techniques for induced sputum analysis.