Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Performance with the 20 + 2L lateral wall cochlear implant

P R Kileny1, T A Zwolan, S A Telian

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor 48109-0312, USA.

The American Journal of Otology
|May 22, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Auditory Event-Related Potentials Elicited From Cochlear Implant Recipients and Hearing Subjects.

American journal of audiology·2015
Same author

Balance System Function.

American journal of audiology·2015
Same author

Prenatal Iron Deficiency and Auditory Brainstem Responses at 3 and 10 Months: A Pilot Study.

The Hong Kong journal of paediatrics : the journal of Hong Kong Paediatric Society = Hsiang-kang erh k'o i hsueh hui hui k'an·2015
Same author

Cochlin isoforms and their interaction with CTL2 (SLC44A2) in the inner ear.

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO·2007
Same author

Absent semicircular canals in CHARGE syndrome: radiologic spectrum of findings.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2006
Same author

Pediatric cochlear implant patient performance as a function of age at implantation.

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2004

This study found that monopolar stimulation modes with the Nucleus 20 + 2L lateral wall cochlear implant improved speech recognition in some patients. The implant

Area of Science:

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Cochlear implants are vital for hearing restoration in severe to profound hearing loss.
  • The Nucleus 20 + 2L lateral wall cochlear implant features an intrascalar electrode array and an apical extracochlear electrode.
  • Optimizing cochlear implant performance requires evaluating different stimulation strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the operating characteristics of the Nucleus 20 + 2L lateral wall cochlear implant.
  • To assess speech recognition outcomes with this device.
  • To compare different electrode stimulation modes.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective randomized study with adult cochlear implant candidates (ages 44-74).
  • Patients received the Nucleus 20 + 2L implant with an intrascalar and apical extracochlear electrode.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Psychophysical and speech recognition testing were performed across five electrode configuration modes.

    • Main Results:

    • Lower thresholds were observed in monopolar stimulation conditions compared to bipolar.
    • Monopolar stimulation modes led to improved speech recognition in 5 out of 9 patients tested.
    • Significant differences in thresholds were found using repeated measures ANOVA.

    Conclusions:

    • The Nucleus 20 + 2L lateral wall cochlear implant is feasible, combining intrascalar and apical lateral electrodes.
    • Monopolar stimulation demonstrated superiority in enhancing speech recognition for selected patients.
    • This study highlights the potential of tailored stimulation strategies for improved cochlear implant outcomes.