Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mapping symbols to response modalities: interference effects on Stroop-like tasks

J V Baldo1, A P Shimamura, W Prinzmetal

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley 94720, USA.

Perception & Psychophysics
|May 26, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Susceptibility to Memory Interference Effects following Frontal Lobe Damage: Findings from Tests of Paired-Associate Learning.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Functional Neuroimaging of Cortical Dysfunction in Alcoholic Korsakoff's Syndrome.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Semantic dementia and persisting Wernicke's aphasia: linguistic and anatomical profiles.

Brain and language·2011
Same author

Source memory enhancement for emotional words.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2003
Same author

Verbal and design fluency in patients with frontal lobe lesions.

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS·2001
Same author

Illusory conjunctions are alive and well: a reply to Donk (1999).

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2001
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

Response compatibility significantly impacts Stroop-like interference. Interference is robust when manual responses are to words and vocal responses are to arrows, highlighting stimulus-response compatibility and target-distractor similarity.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Human-computer interaction
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • The Stroop task is a classic method for studying cognitive interference.
  • Understanding response compatibility is crucial for explaining variations in Stroop effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of response compatibility in Stroop-like interference.
  • To examine how stimulus-response compatibility interacts with target-distractor similarity.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a Stroop-like task with arrow and word stimuli.
  • Subjects responded to either the arrow or word, while ignoring the other stimulus.
  • Manipulated response modality (manual vs. vocal) and stimulus dimension.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Response compatibility significantly influenced Stroop-like interference.
  • Robust interference occurred with manual-to-word and vocal-to-arrow responses.
  • Within-dimension displays showed interference patterns independent of response modality.

Conclusions:

  • Both stimulus-response compatibility and target-distractor similarity are key factors in Stroop-like interference.
  • Response modality interacts with stimulus properties to modulate interference effects.