Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Peripheral bone densitometry: an old friend revisited

M Kleerekoper1, D A Nelson

  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA.

Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association
|May 28, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Factors Associated With Testicular Cancer Risk Among New American Military Recruits During Wartime.

American journal of men's health·2026
Same author

Single-Cell Transcriptomic Analysis of Salivary Gland Endothelial Cells.

Journal of dental research·2024
Same author

Comparing functional outcomes in minimally invasive versus open inguinal hernia repair using the army physical fitness test.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2022
Same author

Hybrid balloon valvuloplasty for management of severe mitral stenosis in four symptomatic, adult dogs.

Journal of veterinary cardiology : the official journal of the European Society of Veterinary Cardiology·2022
Same author

Risk factors for musculoskeletal-related occupational disability among US Army soldiers.

BMJ military health·2021
Same author

Regional Differences following Partial Salivary Gland Resection.

Journal of dental research·2019

Peripheral bone density measurements offer accessible fracture risk assessment. While hip scans are superior, forearm and heel measurements provide valuable, cost-effective screening, especially in primary care settings.

Area of Science:

  • Bone densitometry
  • Osteoporosis research
  • Medical imaging technology

Background:

  • Early bone mass assessments used metacarpal morphometry.
  • Single photon absorptiometry (SPA) allowed quantitative measurements but was limited.
  • Osteoporotic fractures are a significant concern at the spine and hip.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the scientific validity of peripheral bone mass measurement.
  • To explore the potential for wider accessibility of bone density technology.

Main Methods:

  • Development of axial bone mass measurement techniques (DPA, DXA, QCT) for spine and hip.
  • Utilizing peripheral measurements (phalanges, forearm, heel) with existing or portable equipment.
  • Comparing predictive value of hip versus non-hip bone mass measurements for fracture risk.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Hip measurements offer better hip fracture risk prediction (RR 3.0 per SD decrement) than non-hip sites (RR 2.0 per SD decrement).
  • Peripheral measurements, though derived from different study populations, provide valuable fracture risk prediction.
  • Peripheral measurement technology is more accessible and cost-effective than axial methods.

Conclusions:

  • Peripheral bone density measurements are scientifically valid and offer accessible fracture risk assessment.
  • Portable and inexpensive peripheral devices can be deployed in primary care and non-traditional settings.
  • Increased accessibility of bone density testing can improve community health outcomes for osteoporosis.