Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The humeroscapular motion interface

A A Romeo1, T Loutzenheiser, Y G Rhee

  • 1Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
|May 29, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Arthroscopic soft tissue reconstruction in anterior shoulder instability.

Der Orthopade·2018
Same author

Evaluation of fever in the immediate post-operative period following shoulder arthroplasty.

The bone & joint journal·2017
Same author

Comparative outcomes of outpatient and inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of the Medicare dataset.

The bone & joint journal·2017
Same author

Biomechanical testing of the reconstructed ulnar collateral ligament: a systematic review of the literature.

Musculoskeletal surgery·2016
Same author

Recurrent Anterior Compartmental Syndromes.

The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016
Same author

Codman's paradox: Sixty years later.

Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery·2012
Same journal

Which Factors Are Associated With Death, Local Recurrence, and Perioperative Complications After En Bloc Resection for Primary Malignant Tumors of the Mobile Spine?

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

Impact Microindentation Evaluates Bone Strength, Bone Quality, and Fracture Susceptibility Across Skeletal Sites: A Cadaver Study.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

What Is the Effect of Robot Reduction in Displaced Pelvic Fractures? A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

CORR Insights®: Acute or Delayed TKA for Tibial Plateau Fracture? An Observational Study From the Swedish Arthroplasty Register.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Guest Editorial: Recalling a Recall.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

Radial Head Fractures Cluster in the Anterolateral and Anteromedial Quadrants and Do Not Correlate With Coronoid Fracture Types.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
See all related articles

The humeroscapular motion interface, a nonarticular site, allows significant shoulder movement. Restoring motion here is crucial for treating shoulder stiffness and improving overall shoulder function.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedics
  • Radiology
  • Biomechanics

Background:

  • Shoulder motion is often attributed solely to the glenohumeral joint.
  • However, a distinct nonarticular site, the humeroscapular motion interface, also contributes significantly to shoulder movement.
  • This interface involves motion between the proximal humerus and surrounding structures like the acromion and deltoid.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define and characterize the humeroscapular motion interface.
  • To investigate the role of this interface in overall shoulder mobility.
  • To explore the implications of this interface for treating shoulder stiffness.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques to document and measure nonarticular humeroscapular motion.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed interfacial motion at various sites along the humerus and scapula.
  • Quantified the maximum average interfacial motion using axial images.

    • Main Results:

    • Documented significant nonarticular humeroscapular motion, with an average maximum interfacial motion of 29.1 mm at the humeral head's widest diameter.
    • Observed variations in interfacial motion depending on the measurement site.
    • Highlighted the potential for pathologic conditions to impede this sliding motion.

    Conclusions:

    • The humeroscapular motion interface is a critical component of shoulder biomechanics.
    • Pathologic interference with this interface can lead to limited shoulder motion.
    • Successful treatment of shoulder stiffness requires addressing both glenohumeral and humeroscapular interface motion.