Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Modeling interaural-delay sensitivity to frequency modulation at high frequencies

K Saberi1

  • 1Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Research Laboratory of Electronics, Cambridge 02139, USA. kourosh@caltech.edu

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|May 30, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cochlear and neural delays for coincidence detection in owls.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2001
Same author

A level of stimulus representation model for auditory detection and attention.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2001
Same author

Neural bases of an auditory illusion and its elimination in owls.

Nature neuroscience·1999
Same author

Cognitive restoration of reversed speech.

Nature·1999
Same author

Strategies used to detect auditory signals in small sets of random maskers.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1999
Same author

Effects of interaural decorrelation on neural and behavioral detection of spatial cues.

Neuron·1998
Same journal

High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) alters active and diurnal calling amid vessel noise in New York City.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Experimental noise characterisation of phase-locked tandem-rotor in edgewise flight.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The tune-text-temporal synergy: Prosodic effects of final segmental weakening in Neapolitan.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Monitoring vessel movement above critical offshore infrastructure using distributed acoustic sensing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

This study investigated auditory sensitivity to frequency-modulated (FM) and amplitude-modulated (AM) tones, finding optimal detection rates for FM tones at higher frequencies than AM tones. Sensitivity improved with increased modulation depth for both tone types.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Interaural time differences are crucial for sound localization.
  • Sensitivity to amplitude and frequency modulation provides insights into auditory processing mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare interaural-delay sensitivity to high-frequency sinusoidal frequency-modulated (SFM) tones versus sinusoidal amplitude-modulated (SAM) tones.
  • To investigate the effects of modulation rate and depth on SFM and SAM tone perception.
  • To explore binaural fusion and lateralization of hybrid SFM-SAM signals.

Main Methods:

  • Thresholds for SFM and SAM tones were measured across various modulation rates (25-800 Hz) and depths (-12 to 18 dB).
  • Bandpass noise was used to constrain auditory filters.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A nonstationary stochastic model of binaural interaction was employed for data prediction.

    • Main Results:

    • Both SFM and SAM tone sensitivity functions exhibited U-shaped curves, with optimal SFM sensitivity at higher rates (200-400 Hz) than SAM tones (100-200 Hz).
    • Thresholds consistently improved with increased modulation depth for both modulation types.
    • Hybrid SFM-SAM signals could be perceived as fused and lateralized when modulation rates were matched.

    Conclusions:

    • Auditory system exhibits distinct optimal processing rates for frequency versus amplitude modulation.
    • Modulation depth significantly impacts the detection of both SFM and SAM tones.
    • Binaural processing can integrate spectrally distinct but temporally synchronized auditory signals.