Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Assessing mental status in persons with mental retardation

B A Hamer1

  • 1Regional Mental Health Centre, Penetanguishene, Ontario, Canada.

Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services
|May 30, 1998
PubMed
Summary

Effective client assessment requires concrete, open-ended questions. Always evaluate for suicide risk, elopement, and potential harm to self or others, considering underlying factors.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sleep automatism: clinical study in forensic nursing.

Perspectives in psychiatric care·1993
Same author

Music therapy: harmony for change.

Journal of psychosocial nursing and mental health services·1991
Same author

Health teaching needs of psychiatric inpatients.

Canadian journal of nursing administration·1991
Same author

Managing OR patients' fears.

Today's OR nurse·1985

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatric Assessment

Background:

  • Effective client assessment is crucial for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning.
  • Standardized assessment protocols ensure comprehensive evaluation.
  • Understanding client risk factors is paramount in mental health settings.

Observation:

  • Abstract questions can lead to vague or misleading client information.
  • Concrete, open-ended questions elicit more specific and useful data.
  • Failure to assess for specific risks can have severe consequences.

Findings:

  • Direct, specific questioning yields more reliable client information.
  • Systematic risk assessment for suicide, elopement, and harm is essential.
  • Identifying confounding variables improves understanding of mental status.

Implications:

  • Clinicians should prioritize concrete questioning techniques.
  • Implementing routine risk assessments enhances client safety.
  • Awareness of confounding variables improves clinical judgment and patient outcomes.

Related Experiment Videos