Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

DNA damage checkpoints update: getting molecular

T Weinert1

  • 1Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721, USA. tweinert@u.arizona.edu

Current Opinion in Genetics & Development
|June 4, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Decreased cerebral Irp-1B limits impact of social isolation in wild type and Alzheimer's disease modeled in Drosophila melanogaster.

Genes, brain, and behavior·2017
Same author

The replication fork's five degrees of freedom, their failure and genome rearrangements.

Current opinion in cell biology·2009
Same author

Details and concerns regarding the G2/M DNA damage checkpoint in budding yeast.

Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology·2003
Same author

Closing the gaps among a web of DNA repair disorders.

BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology·2000
Same author

Sensor-less checkpoint activation?

Nature cell biology·1999
Same author

Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint genes MEC1, RAD17 and RAD24 are required for normal meiotic recombination partner choice.

Genetics·1999
Same journal

Temporal trajectories underlying adult neuronal diversity.

Current opinion in genetics & development·2026
Same journal

Transcription regulation of cell fate plasticity - from embryonic development to tissue regeneration.

Current opinion in genetics & development·2026
Same journal

Shared molecular and cellular programs during regeneration of glandular epithelia.

Current opinion in genetics & development·2026
Same journal

Lineage tracing in human cortical development.

Current opinion in genetics & development·2026
Same journal

Cis-regulatory strategies in developmental patterning.

Current opinion in genetics & development·2026
Same journal

GABAergic neuron fate specification and lineage allocation: from development to disorder.

Current opinion in genetics & development·2026
See all related articles

Eukaryotic cells pause the cell cycle to repair DNA damage. Studies in budding yeast reveal key genes and pathways, with biochemical models explaining some damage responses, though puzzles remain.

Area of Science:

  • Cell Biology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Eukaryotic cell cycle progression is regulated by checkpoint controls.
  • These controls respond to DNA damage or replication errors.
  • Budding yeast has been a model organism for studying these responses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review genetic and physiological studies of checkpoint controls in budding yeast.
  • To discuss recent biochemical models of G1 arrest and replication delays.
  • To highlight puzzling aspects of checkpoint controls.

Main Methods:

  • Review of genetic and physiological studies.
  • Analysis of biochemical models.
  • Identification of unresolved questions in checkpoint control.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Key genes and genetic pathways involved in checkpoint responses have been identified.
  • Biochemical models partially explain G1 arrest and replication delays.
  • Several puzzling observations in checkpoint control remain unexplained.

Conclusions:

  • Significant progress has been made in understanding eukaryotic cell cycle checkpoints.
  • Biochemical models provide insights into DNA damage response mechanisms.
  • Further research is needed to resolve remaining complexities in checkpoint control.