Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Utilization review of simultaneously ordered multiple radiologic tests for the same symptom

J G Bova1, L B Villalobos

  • 1Department of Radiology, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus 43210, USA.

American Journal of Medical Quality : the Official Journal of the American College of Medical Quality
|June 5, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

MR cholangiopancreatography in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: interobserver variability and comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2002
Same author

Cirrhosis: spectrum of findings on unenhanced and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging.

Abdominal imaging·2002
Same author

Canine abdominal MRI at 8 Tesla: initial experience with conventional gradient-recalled echo and rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) techniques.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·2001
Same author

Detection of bile duct leaks using MR cholangiography with mangfodipir trisodium (Teslascan).

Journal of computer assisted tomography·2001
Same author

Case 2. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat content.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2000
Same author

Case 3. Spontaneous uroepithelial hemorrhage caused by warfarin overdose.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2000

Ordering multiple radiologic tests simultaneously for one problem leads to many inappropriate procedures. This retrospective analysis found 60% of tests were unnecessary, highlighting a need for improved diagnostic strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Simultaneous ordering of multiple radiologic procedures for a single clinical issue is common.
  • Assessing the appropriateness of these multiple, concurrent tests is crucial for healthcare efficiency and patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the utilization and appropriateness of multiple radiologic procedures ordered concurrently for the same clinical problem.
  • To compare the retrospective coding of appropriateness by study authors versus initial interpreting radiologists.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective study of 93 patients undergoing 214 radiologic examinations ordered simultaneously.
  • Application of American College of Radiology Utilization Findings Codes (beta versions II and III).
  • Review of patient charts for indication, diagnosis, and treatment.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • 60% of 214 radiologic examinations were retrospectively coded as inappropriate using beta II.
  • Authors' retrospective coding identified 55% of reports as inappropriate, compared to 16% by initial radiologists (P < 0.0001).
  • Using beta III, 79% of examinations yielded negative results, with no significant difference between primary care physicians and specialists.

Conclusions:

  • Simultaneous ordering of multiple radiologic tests for a single clinical problem results in a high rate of inappropriate procedures.
  • Retrospective assessment indicates a significant underestimation of inappropriateness by initial interpreting radiologists.
  • The high proportion of negative results suggests potential overuse and inefficiency in current radiologic test ordering practices.