Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease international guidelines

L Fabbri1, G Caramori, B Beghe

  • 1Dipartmento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Universita di Ferrara, Italy.

Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine
|June 5, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Update on Non-Biological and RNA-Based Therapeutics in Chronic Inflammatory Diseases: Precision Medicine Through Small Molecules: An EAACI Position Paper.

Allergy·2026
Same author

Italian multicentre study on the management of pLeural infection and empyema: IMPLE study.

Respiratory research·2025
Same author

Reply to Correspondence: The Bronchodilator and Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonists in Asthma: An EAACI Position Paper.

Allergy·2025
Same author

Raising the bar in respiratory care by EUFOREA: report of the European Union Parliament Symposium, April 2024.

Frontiers in allergy·2025
Same author

Auto-antibodies against carbonyl-modified vimentin in COPD: potential role as a biomarker.

Journal of inflammation (London, England)·2025
Same author

The Bronchodilator and Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonists in Asthma: An EAACI Position Paper.

Allergy·2024
Same journal

Nonsteroid treatment options in (pulmonary) sarcoidosis. When to consider and why?

Current opinion in pulmonary medicine·2026
Same journal

Multidisciplinary approach in cardiac sarcoidosis: to biopsy or not?

Current opinion in pulmonary medicine·2026
Same journal

Low diffusion capacity in pulmonary hypertension.

Current opinion in pulmonary medicine·2026
Same journal

Toward precision imaging in interstitial lung disease: advances in quantitative imaging and artificial intelligence.

Current opinion in pulmonary medicine·2026
Same journal

Oxygen therapy in interstitial lung disease - navigating benefit and burden.

Current opinion in pulmonary medicine·2026
Same journal

Preclinical and clinical advances in pulmonary hypertension associated with systemic sclerosis.

Current opinion in pulmonary medicine·2026
See all related articles

This review compares chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management guidelines from major thoracic societies, highlighting similarities and differences. Limited evidence underscores the need for more research in COPD care.

Area of Science:

  • Pulmonology
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

Background:

  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a significant public health concern, yet receives less attention than asthma.
  • Multiple thoracic societies have developed COPD management guidelines since 1987.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and compare the similarities and discrepancies among international COPD management guidelines.
  • To identify areas where evidence-based medicine is limited, stimulating further research.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of COPD management guidelines from the American Thoracic Society, Canadian Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand, and British Thoracic Society.
  • Identification of common themes and divergent recommendations within these guidelines.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Key COPD guidelines exhibit both commonalities and notable differences in their recommendations.
  • The development of these guidelines spans from 1987 to 1997, with updates and expansions.

Conclusions:

  • International COPD guidelines share commonalities but also present distinct approaches to management.
  • A significant limitation across all guidelines is the scarcity of robust evidence-based medicine, emphasizing the need for continued research in COPD.