Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ventricular pacemaker upgrade: experience, complications and recommendations

D J Hildick-Smith1, M D Lowe, S A Newell

  • 1Department of Cardiology, Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

Heart (British Cardiac Society)
|June 9, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Chloral Hydrate versus Isofluorane anesthesia and their differential impact on the midbrain system.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2026
Same author

The medial septum enhances reversal learning via opposing actions on ventral tegmental area and substantia nigra dopamine neurons.

Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology·2019
Same author

Correction: Altered activation and connectivity in a hippocampal-basal ganglia-midbrain circuit during salience processing in subjects at ultra high risk for psychosis.

Translational psychiatry·2018
Same author

Altered activation and connectivity in a hippocampal-basal ganglia-midbrain circuit during salience processing in subjects at ultra high risk for psychosis.

Translational psychiatry·2017
Same author

Oxidative stress-driven parvalbumin interneuron impairment as a common mechanism in models of schizophrenia.

Molecular psychiatry·2017
Same author

Response to: Depolarization vs. repolarization: what is the mechanism of ventricular arrhythmogenesis underlying sodium channel haploinsufficiency in mouse hearts?

Acta physiologica (Oxford, England)·2016
Same journal

Feasibility of early double sequential defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the double-D randomised pilot trial.

Heart (British Cardiac Society)·2026
Same journal

Correspondence on 'When a patent foramen ovale becomes pathological' by Saji and Ohara.

Heart (British Cardiac Society)·2026
Same journal

Cost-effectiveness of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide thresholds for echocardiography referral in primary care heart failure management.

Heart (British Cardiac Society)·2026
Same journal

Optimal timing of aspirin discontinuation after acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Heart (British Cardiac Society)·2026
Same journal

Importance of rating: the impact of establishing age and sex normative values for left ventricular strain rate.

Heart (British Cardiac Society)·2026
Same journal

Man in his 40s with palpitations.

Heart (British Cardiac Society)·2026
See all related articles

Pacemaker upgrades from single chamber to dual chamber systems take longer and have more complications than initial implantations. This procedure should only be performed by experienced operators for clear indications.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Cardiac Electrophysiology
  • Medical Device Technology

Background:

  • Single chamber ventricular pacemakers (VVI) are often implanted initially.
  • Advancements in pacing technology allow for upgrades to dual chamber systems (DDD).
  • Understanding the outcomes of these upgrades is crucial for patient management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the outcomes of upgrading pacemakers from single chamber ventricular (VVI) to dual chamber (DDD) systems.
  • To compare the procedure duration and complication rates of upgrades versus initial pacemaker implantations.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 44 patients undergoing pacemaker upgrade.
  • Data collected on procedure duration, indications, and complications.
  • Comparison with historical data of VVI and DDD implantation durations.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The primary indications for upgrade were pacemaker syndrome, heart failure, and opportunistic replacement.
  • Upgrade procedure duration (82.9 min) was significantly longer than VVI (42.9 min) or DDD (56.6 min) implantation.
  • A high complication rate of 45% was observed, including pneumothorax, arrhythmias, and lead issues.

Conclusions:

  • Pacemaker upgrade procedures are associated with increased duration and complication rates compared to initial implantations.
  • The study recommends that upgrades be performed by experienced operators and only when a clear clinical indication exists.
  • Avoid implanting VVI systems with the expectation of a low-risk future upgrade if atrial activity is present.