Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Face detection in peripheral vision: do faces pop out?

V Brown1, D Huey, J M Findlay

  • 1University of Durham, Department of Psychology, UK. Valerie.Brown@durham.ac.uk

Perception
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Potential cost-effectiveness of outdoor unhealthy food and drink advertising restrictions in Western Australia.

Public health nutrition·2026
Same author

Understanding the reach of an evidence-based public health intervention to optimise nutrition and movement behaviour at scale: The INFANT Program.

Australian and New Zealand journal of public health·2025
Same author

Exploring the Broader Benefits of Obesity Prevention Community-based Interventions From the Perspective of Multiple Stakeholders.

Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy·2024
Same author

A quantitative evaluation of aerosol generation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Anaesthesia·2023
Same author

A Pragmatic Randomized Trial Comparing Surgical Clipping and Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2023
Same author

Concordance between a gastrointestinal consultant radiologist, a consultant radiologist and qualified reporting radiographers interpreting abdominal radiographs.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2023
Same journal

Predictive models and parameter analysis for multiple tactile perceptions in skin-wet fabrics interface.

Perception·2026
Same journal

High-resolution kitsch by AI: Why society needs art, not more AI content.

Perception·2026
Same journal

Benchmarking spatial discrimination thresholds of two-frame motion defined forms compared to luminance and stereoscopic defined forms.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The effect of face masks on the perception of trustworthiness and competence in individuals with autistic traits.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The importance of external features for categorizing ethnicity: can Koreans identify Korean, Japanese, and Chinese faces?

Perception·2026
Same journal

Interoception, alexithymia, and motor congruency: Psychological drivers of body ownership in virtual reality.

Perception·2026
See all related articles

Faces do not produce a rapid "pop-out" effect in visual search. However, upright faces show a processing advantage over inverted faces in peripheral vision, especially after training.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • The 'pop-out' effect describes the rapid, effortless identification of a target stimulus that differs from its distractors.
  • Previous research has explored the pop-out effect for various objects, but its application to faces remains less understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether faces elicit a 'pop-out' effect in visual search tasks.
  • To examine the influence of training on face detection performance.
  • To determine if upright faces have a processing advantage over inverted faces in visual search.

Main Methods:

  • Experiments involved measuring eye movements and search latencies during visual search tasks.
  • Participants searched for target faces (upright or inverted) among distractor faces.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Stimuli included photographic and feature-only faces; training conditions varied.

    • Main Results:

    • Naive participants were initially poor at distinguishing upright from inverted faces.
    • Performance improved significantly with practice, indicating a learning effect.
    • Upright faces showed a processing advantage over inverted faces in peripheral vision, particularly after training.

    Conclusions:

    • Faces do not exhibit a direct, rapid 'pop-out' effect in visual search.
    • Training enhances the ability to discriminate between upright and inverted faces.
    • An upright face processing advantage exists in peripheral vision, suggesting specialized face processing mechanisms.