Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Recurrent inguinal hernia: preferred operative approach

P G Janu1, K D Sellers, E C Mangiante

  • 1Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee at Memphis, USA.

The American Surgeon
|June 10, 1998
PubMed
Summary

Mesh repair for recurrent inguinal hernias offers superior outcomes, significantly reducing recurrence rates compared to non-mesh repairs. This approach, particularly preperitoneal mesh repair, is recommended for better long-term results in inguinal hernia surgery.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neuroanatomy of the pelvis: implications for colonic and rectal resection.

Diseases of the colon and rectum·2000
Same author

Graduate surgical trainee attitudes toward postoperative thromboprophylaxis.

Southern medical journal·1999
Same author

Prospective, multicenter study of laparoscopic ventral hernioplasty. Preliminary results.

Surgical endoscopy·1998
Same author

Glycyl-L-glutamine-enriched total parenteral nutrition maintains small intestine gut-associated lymphoid tissue and upper respiratory tract immunity.

JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition·1998
Same author

Mesh inguinal herniorrhaphy: a ten-year review.

The American surgeon·1997
Same author

Simultaneous repair of bilateral inguinal hernias under local anesthesia.

Annals of surgery·1997

Area of Science:

  • General Surgery
  • Surgical Innovation
  • Hernia Repair

Background:

  • Inguinal hernia repair is a common procedure, with 10-20% of cases involving recurrence.
  • Repairing recurrent inguinal hernias presents significant technical challenges and increased recurrence risk.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the outcomes of mesh versus non-mesh repairs for recurrent inguinal hernias.
  • To evaluate both anterior and posterior surgical approaches for recurrent inguinal hernia repair.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective study of 146 patients undergoing recurrent inguinal hernia repair from 1985-1994.
  • Stratification of patients by repair type: Lichtenstein (Mesh), open anterior (OA), and preperitoneal (with or without mesh).
  • Comparison of operative time, hospital stay, infection rates, and recurrence rates between groups.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Mesh repair operative time was longer than OA or preperitoneal without mesh repairs.
  • Wound infection and mesh removal rates were low for mesh repairs.
  • Mesh repair demonstrated significantly lower recurrence rates (5.9% for Mesh, 1.9% for mesh-based posterior) compared to non-mesh repairs (18.0% for OA, 21.6% for non-mesh posterior).

Conclusions:

  • Anterior or posterior mesh repair techniques for recurrent inguinal hernias yield superior recurrence rates.
  • Mesh repair does not increase infection risk or hospital stay compared to non-mesh repairs.
  • Preperitoneal mesh-based repair is identified as the preferred technique for recurrent inguinal hernias.