Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Indications for third molar surgery

C A Pratt1, M Hekmat, J D Barnard

  • 1Maxillofacial Unit, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK.

Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh
|June 11, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Author Correction: Forearc carbon sink reduces long-term volatile recycling into the mantle.

Nature·2019
Same author

Author Correction: Forearc carbon sink reduces long-term volatile recycling into the mantle.

Nature·2019
Same author

Forearc carbon sink reduces long-term volatile recycling into the mantle.

Nature·2019
Same author

Lack of renal protection of ultrafiltration during cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial.

The Journal of cardiovascular surgery·2013
Same author

Pentoxifylline and tocopherol in the management of patients with osteoradionecrosis, the Portsmouth experience.

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2011
Same author

Primary epithelial submandibular salivary gland tumours--review of management in a district general hospital setting.

Oral oncology·2008
Same journal

Haematuria investigation based on a standard protocol: emphasis on the diagnosis of urological malignancy.

Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh·2003
Same journal

The Dundee protocol for investigation of haematuria.

Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh·2003
Same journal

A novel idea for the treatment of fistula-in-ano.

Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh·2003
Same journal

Penile metastasis: an unusual presentation of metastatic colonic cancer.

Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh·2003
Same journal

Clinical and functional results of open operative repair for Achilles tendon rupture in a non-specialist surgical unit.

Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh·2003
Same journal

Cellular transplantation: new horizons in the surgical management of heart failure.

Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh·2003
See all related articles

Prophylactic lower third molar surgery is not as widespread as previously reported. A study found that 96% of patients undergoing this procedure met established criteria for removal, refuting earlier claims.

Area of Science:

  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Dental Public Health

Background:

  • Recent reports suggested prophylactic lower third molar surgery is common, potentially up to 50% of treatments.
  • This practice has raised concerns regarding overtreatment and resource allocation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To objectively evaluate the necessity of prophylactic lower third molar surgery.
  • To compare findings with previous data and investigate discrepancies.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective study of 454 consecutive patients referred for third molar surgery.
  • Concurrent retrospective audit of patients on the waiting list for surgery.
  • Analysis of adherence to nationally defined surgical criteria.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • 96% of prospective patients met at least one defined surgical criterion.
  • 97% of audited patients on the waiting list had a valid criterion for surgery.
  • Only 11 patients (2.4%) were treated without a defined criterion, all with partially erupted teeth.

    • Conclusions:

    • The study refutes claims of widespread prophylactic lower third molar surgery.
    • The majority of patients undergoing third molar surgery have valid clinical indications.
    • Further investigation into variations in surgical practice may be warranted.