Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026

Creating Dynamic Images of Short-lived Dopamine Fluctuations with lp-ntPET: Dopamine Movies of Cigarette Smoking
Published on: August 6, 2013
Arylpiperazines with serotonin-3 antagonist activity: a comparative molecular field analysis
A Morreale1, E Gálvez-Ruano, I Iriepa-Canalda
1Department of Chemistry, Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis (IUPUI), 402 North Blackford Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202-3274, USA.
Abstract:
Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) is applied to antagonists of the 5-HT3 receptor. Analysis is done separately on three published sets of arylpiperazines and on a combination of the three sets. d-Tubocurarine, a conformationally restricted 5-HT3 ligand, is used as a template to assist in selecting the conformation of the antagonists for CoMFA alignment. Two forms of the arylpiperazines (neutral and protonated) and three different kinds of calculated charges (Gasteiger-Hückel, AM1, and AM1 with solvation effect included) are compared. Protonated structures give better statistical results than the neutral species. The way in which charges are calculated does not greatly affect the results. In terms of molecular fields, the behavior in each separate set of compounds cannot be extrapolated to the combined set of 47 compounds. The average value of r2cv from PLS cross-validation on the combined set is 0.70 and varies between 0.56 and 0.80 depending on the orientation of the molecules in the coordinate system. The CoMFA model is tested on four compounds not in the training set: quipazine, N-methylquipazine, 4-phenyl-N-methylquipazine, and KB-6933. Mean agreement of experimental and predicted pKi values of the antagonists is 0.7 log unit. Novel structural modifications are interpreted by the CoMFA model.
More Related Videos
08:49Rapid In Situ Hybridization using Oligonucleotide Probes on Paraformaldehyde-prefixed Brain of Rats with Serotonin Syndrome
Published on: September 23, 2015
07:16Methods for the Discovery of Novel Compounds Modulating a Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Receptor Type A Neurotransmission
Published on: August 16, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Adrenergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship
Aromatic ring substitutions: Substituting the aromatic ring with –OH groups at positions 3 and 4 yields catecholamines (e.g., epinephrine), which have a high affinity for adrenoceptors. Hydrogen bonding between –OH groups and receptors enhances adrenergic activity.
Separation of the aromatic...
Adrenergic Antagonists: Chemistry and Classification of ɑ-Receptor Blockers
Nonselective α-blockers: Nonselective α-blockers contain haloalkylamine or imidazoline moieties. Phenoxybenzamine, with a haloalkylamine...
Antipsychotic Drugs: Typical and Atypical Agents
Antidepressant Drugs: MAOIs and Other Agents
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Serotonin Receptor Agonists
Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence its...