Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

Development of an In Vitro Ocular Platform to Test Contact Lenses
Published on: April 6, 2016
Comparison by contact lens cytology and clinical tests of three contact lens types
G Wilson1, J D Schwallie, R E Bauman
1Department of Physiological Optics, School of Optometry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
Purpose:
To determine if hydrogel lens materials from different FDA groups have different effects on the human ocular surface.
Methods:
Contact lenses from Groups I and II, and Group IV were tested on 10 healthy adapted hydrogel contact lens wearers. For each comparison, the subject wore 2 new contact lenses for approximately 45 min. Lens movement was measured, and comfort evaluated using a subjective scale. After removal of the lenses, fluorescein staining and tear break-up time were measured. Cells were collected by contact lens cytology (CLC), and the size and number of cells harvested from each lens were determined.
Results:
There were differences between lens groups in lens movement and comfort, but no differences in fluorescein staining or tear break-up time. CLC showed no differences in cell counts or cell size. There was no correlation between the results of CLC and the clinical tests for lens movement, lens comfort, tear break-up time, and fluorescein staining.
Conclusions:
With short durations of lens wear, differences in ionicity and water content have no effect upon the size and number of cells collected from a contact lens. This suggests that, in the short-term, the shedding of cells beneath a hydrogel lens is not affected by the choices of lens material.
Related Concept Videos
Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy
Three-Dimensional Microscopy in Microbiology

