Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Genetic toxicology

P J Kramer1

  • 1Institute of Toxicology, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.

The Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology
|June 13, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Genetic toxicology testing requires a battery of in-vitro and in-vivo assays, as no single test detects all genotoxic agents. New, more efficient, and relevant tests are needed to meet the demands of modern pharmaceutical research and risk assessment.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The polycyclic musk 7-acetyl-1,1,3,4,4,6-hexamethyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthaline lacks liver tumor initiating and promoting activity in rats exposed to human-relevant doses.

Archives of toxicology·2002
Same author

Neurotoxicity risk assessment of MPTP (N-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine) as a synthetic impurity of drugs.

Human & experimental toxicology·1998
Same author

Engineering of novel polyketides. Progress and Prospects.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·1996
Same author

Observation of a water-depletion region surrounding loblolly pine roots by magnetic resonance imaging.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·1990
Same author

Magnetic resonance microscopy of changes in water content in stems of transpiring plants.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·1987
Same author

In Vivo Magnetic Resonance Microscopy of Changing Water Content in Pelargonium hortorum Roots.

Plant physiology·1986
Same journal

Uterine relaxant effects of Ageratum conyzoides essential oil: influence of hormonal status and calcium modulation.

The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology·2026
Same journal

Liraglutide-mediated protection against ethanol-induced gastric ulcer in male and female rats: enhancement of mucosal defense, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant mechanism.

The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology·2026
Same journal

Exploring the mechanism of action of Qufengzhitong pills in treating rheumatoid arthritis via the PI3K/AKT, NF-κB, and MAPK pathways.

The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology·2026
Same journal

Mechanistic evidence for PI3K/Akt-driven reactivation of Nrf2/HO-1 by dapagliflozin in acute cisplatin hepatotoxicity.

The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology·2026
Same journal

Advances in nano-drug delivery systems for targeting therapy of breast cancer.

The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology·2026
Same journal

Zi Shen decoction inhibits non-small cell lung cancer progression by regulating macrophage polarization via the gut microbiota.

The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Genetics
  • Risk Assessment

Background:

  • Current genotoxicity testing relies on established batteries of in-vitro and in-vivo assays developed over two decades.
  • No single test system can identify all genotoxic agents, necessitating a multi-test approach.
  • Standardized test batteries have been defined by international organizations like the EU, OECD, and ICH.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current genotoxicity testing systems and discuss supplementary assays.
  • To highlight the need for novel test systems that are more human-relevant, cost-effective, and time-efficient.
  • To address the evolving landscape of pharmaceutical research, including genomics and high-throughput screening.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of standard battery tests for genotoxicity.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of supplementary and confirmatory genotoxicity assays.
  • Consideration of emerging technologies in pharmaceutical research.

    • Main Results:

    • Established genotoxicity test batteries are widely used but have limitations.
    • There is a critical need for the development of new genotoxicity assessment tools.
    • Modern pharmaceutical research necessitates faster and more predictive toxicology methods.

    Conclusions:

    • Genetic toxicology must adapt to address both hazard/risk identification and high-throughput testing demands.
    • Future genotoxicity testing requires innovation to align with advancements in drug discovery and development.
    • The field needs to develop assays that are more predictive of human response and resource-efficient.