Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sources of error in bioimpedance spectroscopy

M P Bolton1, L C Ward, A Khan

  • 1Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK. bolton@fs1.with.man.ac.uk

Physiological Measurement
|June 17, 1998
PubMed
Summary

Different bioimpedance spectrometers showed significant in vivo variations despite bench accuracy. Environmental stray capacitance and electrode factors contribute to these differences, impacting clinical data reliability.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Induction of tolerance by mixed chimerism with nonmyeloblative host conditioning: the importance of overcoming intrathymic alloresistance.

Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation·2001
Same author

Measurement of CP-violating asymmetries in B0 decays to CP eigenstates.

Physical review letters·2001
Same author

The placebo enigma in antidepressant clinical trials.

Journal of clinical psychopharmacology·2001
Same author

Defective stimulus-secretion coupling in islets of Psammomys obesus, an animal model for type 2 diabetes.

Diabetes·2001
Same author

Hyperglycemia contributes to impaired insulin response in GK rat islets.

Diabetes·2001
Same author

O2 dependence of K+ transport in sickle cells: the effect of different cell populations and the substituted benzaldehyde 12C79.

FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology·2001

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Clinical Monitoring

Background:

  • Bioimpedance spectroscopy is used for in vivo measurements.
  • Variations in readings between devices have been observed, particularly in critical care settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate discrepancies in bioimpedance spectrometer readings between two different models (UniQuest-SEAC SFB-3 and Xitron 4000B).
  • To identify factors contributing to in vivo measurement variability.

Main Methods:

  • Bench testing of spectrometers on resistor-capacitor circuits.
  • In vivo measurements on volunteers and intensive care patients.
  • Laboratory simulations to replicate in vivo conditions and test environmental factors.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Both spectrometers were accurate on bench tests but showed significant in vivo differences.
  • Stray capacitance in the environment was a major cause of high-frequency variability.
  • Electrode impedance and lead positioning also influenced results.
  • The Xitron's time delay (Td) likely stems from stray capacitance, not biological phenomena.

    • Conclusions:

    • In vivo bioimpedance spectrometer values differ due to instrument design, data processing, and the clinical environment.
    • Environmental factors like stray capacitance are critical for accurate high-frequency bioimpedance measurements.
    • Careful consideration of these factors is necessary for reliable clinical application of bioimpedance spectroscopy.