Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Cecal Ligation Puncture Procedure
Published on: May 7, 2011
Scope and limitations of antimicrobial therapy of sepsis in surgery
D H Wittmann1, A Wittmann-Tylor
1Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53226, USA.
Objective:
The goal of antibiotic therapy for surgical sepsis is to kill bacteria that intermittently or continuously reach the bloodstream from the residue of an operatively treated focus. While sepsis and conditions leading to sepsis compromise the immune system, antibiotics may become a fundamental determinant of the host's defense. No data from sound prospective randomized clinical antibiotic trials dealing with sepsis are available. Therefore we tested the hypothesis that treatment recommendations can be based on pharmacodynamics comparing in vitro activity of commonly used antimicrobials with concentrations sustained in vivo to provide for full coverage for bacteria of concern.
Results:
The application of strict criteria for antibiotic choice to avoid selection of primary resistant strains reveals that most commonly used antibiotics render insufficient activity to eliminate pathogens that commonly cause surgical sepsis. Antibiotics that sustain in vivo concentration exceeding fourfold the MIC100 (highest minimal inhibitory concentration for all (100%) species tested) of Escherichia coli, for example, are 400 mg ciprofloxacin IV (MIC100 of 1224 strains=0.06 mg/dl, in vivo concentration=1 mg/dl for 12 h), and 1000 mg imipenem/cilastatin (MIC100 of 3142 strains=0.14 mg/dl, in vivo concentration=2 mg/dl for 6 h). The third choice is one of the fourth- or, less convincingly, third-generation cephalosporins. Similar data for most pathogens causing sepsis are provided. First- and second-generation cephalosporins and penicillin beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations generally do not achieve sufficient concentrations to cover the most important pathogens of sepsis.
Conclusion:
Sepsis is defined as a whole body's inflammatory response that is characterized by systemic signs and symptoms secondary to a focal infection. While many antibiotic trials have dealt with a focal infection, no prospective randomized antibiotic trial has dealt with sepsis per se. Antibiotic trials on focal infections generally exclude patients when their focal infection has progressed to sepsis. To circumvent the lack of controlled clinical trials we show that pharmacodynamics may provide sound foundation for antibiotic choice for sepsis.
Insights
Pharmacodynamics can guide antibiotic selection for surgical sepsis when clinical trials are lacking. Many common antibiotics do not achieve sufficient concentrations to combat sepsis-causing bacteria effectively.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Sepsis, a systemic inflammatory response to infection, poses a significant challenge in surgical patients.
- Effective antibiotic therapy is crucial for combating bloodstream bacterial infections originating from surgical sites.
- Limited prospective randomized clinical trials exist specifically for antibiotic treatment of sepsis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the hypothesis that pharmacodynamic principles can inform antibiotic selection for surgical sepsis.
- To compare the in vitro activity of common antimicrobials with their in vivo concentrations against sepsis pathogens.
Main Methods:
- Utilized pharmacodynamics to compare in vitro antimicrobial activity with in vivo drug concentrations.
- Assessed antibiotic coverage against common bacterial pathogens responsible for surgical sepsis.
- Applied strict criteria for antibiotic selection to avoid promoting resistant strains.
Main Results:
- Most commonly used antibiotics demonstrated insufficient activity against key sepsis pathogens.
- Specific antibiotics like ciprofloxacin and imipenem/cilastatin showed adequate concentrations against Escherichia coli.
- Fourth- and third-generation cephalosporins were considered viable options, while earlier generations and penicillin combinations were inadequate.
Conclusions:
- Pharmacodynamics offers a robust framework for selecting antibiotics in sepsis management, particularly in the absence of extensive clinical trial data.
- Current antibiotic choices may not consistently achieve the necessary concentrations to eradicate sepsis-causing pathogens.
- This approach aids in optimizing antibiotic therapy for surgical sepsis by ensuring adequate pathogen coverage.
Related Concept Videos
Asepsis
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test
Microbiota Modulation by Antibiotics
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance

