Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Why autologous tissue?

S S Kroll1

  • 1Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.

Clinics in Plastic Surgery
|June 17, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Autologous tissue breast reconstruction offers superior, natural results compared to implants, with outcomes improving over time. This method is cost-effective long-term and preferable for suitable candidates.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reconstructive management of contralateral breast cancer in patients who previously underwent unilateral breast reconstruction.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2001
Same author

Comparison of immediate and delayed free TRAM flap breast reconstruction in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2001
Same author

Thrombolytic therapy: what is its role in free flap salvage?

Annals of plastic surgery·2001
Same author

Aesthetically successful mandibular reconstruction with a single reconstruction plate.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2001
Same author

Comparison of cost for DIEP and free TRAM flap breast reconstructions.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2001
Same author

Comparison of the costs of DIEP and TRAM flaps.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2001
Same journal

Lower-Extremity Reconstruction: Principles, Progress, and Perspectives.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Pediatric.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Lower Extremity Reconstruction in Acute Burns.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Chronic Lower Extremity Wounds: Updates on Lower Extremity Reconstruction in Clinics in Plastic Surgery.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Updates in Lower Extremity Reconstruction: Post Sarcoma.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Fillet Flaps for Lower Extremity Salvage.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Reconstructive Surgery
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Breast reconstruction is a critical component of breast cancer treatment.
  • Prosthetic implants and autologous tissue transfer are primary reconstruction methods.
  • Implant-based reconstruction can lead to complications like capsular contractures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of autologous tissue breast reconstruction versus implant-based methods.
  • To evaluate the aesthetic and functional results of different breast reconstruction techniques.
  • To provide guidance on the preferred method for breast reconstruction.

Main Methods:

  • Review of outcomes for autologous tissue reconstruction (e.g., transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous [TRAM] flaps).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison with outcomes of tissue expansion and implant-based reconstruction.
  • Analysis of long-term costs associated with each method.

    • Main Results:

    • Autologous tissue reconstruction yields more natural results and better breast simulation than implants.
    • Autologous reconstruction outcomes tend to improve over time, unlike implant-based methods.
    • Long-term costs of autologous reconstruction are comparable or lower than implant-based approaches.

    Conclusions:

    • Autologous tissue is generally preferable for breast reconstruction due to superior aesthetics and durability.
    • The method avoids common implant complications like capsular contractures.
    • Patient suitability remains a key factor in selecting the optimal reconstruction technique.