Related Experiment Videos
Timing variability of repetitive saccadic eye movements
C J Collins1, M Jahanshahi, G R Barnes
1MRC Human Movement and Balance Unit, Institute of Neurology, London, UK. ccollins@ion.ucl.ac.uk
Experimental Brain Research
|June 17, 1998
Summary
The Wing and Kristofferson model
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Motor Control
- Ophthalmology
Background:
- The Wing and Kristofferson model is used to analyze timing variability in repetitive motor responses.
- Understanding timing variability in saccadic eye movements is crucial for neurological and ophthalmological research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the applicability of the Wing and Kristofferson model for analyzing timing variability in repetitive saccadic eye movements.
- To investigate the central (CV) and peripheral motor delay (MV) components of timing variability during saccades.
Main Methods:
- Eight healthy subjects performed voluntary horizontal saccades synchronized with an auditory metronome.
- Inter-saccade intervals (ISIs) were analyzed during both paced and unpaced phases to calculate total timing variability (TV), CV, and MV.
- Three different auditory cue intervals (496 ms, 752 ms, 1000 ms) were used.
Main Results:
- Subjects accurately matched saccade intervals to auditory cues and maintained response frequencies in the unpaced phase.
- Negative correlation between successive ISIs and increased TV and CV with longer intervals were observed, aligning with the model's predictions.
- Contrary to the model's expectation, the peripheral motor delay (MV) component increased with interval duration.
Conclusions:
- The study's findings do not definitively confirm the Wing and Kristofferson model's validity for analyzing saccadic eye movement timing variability.
- Despite discrepancies, the model appears equally applicable to saccadic eye movements as to other motor responses in healthy individuals.