Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating agreement with a gold standard in method comparison studies

R T St Laurent1

  • 1Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff 86011-5717, USA. Roy.St.Laurent@nau.edu

Biometrics
|June 18, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Benzodiazepine receptor binding in the cerebellum in multiple system atrophy and olivopontocerebellar atrophy studied with positron emission tomography.

Advances in neurology·1996
Same author

Benzodiazepine receptor binding in cerebellar degenerations studied with positron emission tomography.

Annals of neurology·1995
Same author

A comparison of cerebral blood flow and glucose metabolism in olivopontocerebellar atrophy using PET.

Neurology·1995
Same author

Clinical dementia rating.

Neurology·1994
Same author

Patterns of cerebral glucose metabolism detected with positron emission tomography differ in multiple system atrophy and olivopontocerebellar atrophy.

Annals of neurology·1994
Same author

Alternative calculation of the global clinical dementia rating.

Alzheimer disease and associated disorders·1993

This study introduces a new statistical model for comparing measurement methods when a gold standard is available. The proposed agreement measure offers a population correlation coefficient for method comparison studies.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Statistics
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Method comparison studies are crucial for evaluating diagnostic tests and measurement techniques.
  • Existing methods for assessing agreement may not fully account for the presence of a gold standard.
  • A robust statistical framework is needed to quantify agreement in the presence of a gold standard.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a statistical model for method comparison studies with a gold standard.
  • To propose a novel measure of agreement interpretable as a constrained bivariate correlation coefficient.
  • To provide an estimator for this agreement measure and explore its statistical properties.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a statistical model tailored for method comparison studies incorporating a gold standard.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Formulation of a new agreement measure derived from a constrained bivariate model.
  • Derivation and theoretical analysis of an estimator for the proposed agreement measure.

    • Main Results:

    • A novel statistical model for method comparison studies with a gold standard was developed.
    • A new measure of agreement, analogous to a population correlation coefficient, was proposed.
    • The statistical properties of the proposed estimator were investigated.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed statistical model and agreement measure provide a valuable tool for method comparison studies.
    • The proposed methodology enhances the evaluation of measurement techniques in the presence of a gold standard.
    • The application to medical literature data demonstrates the practical utility of the new approach.