Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The efficiency of the multiple trial randomized response technique

P T Liu, L P Chow

    Biometrics
    |September 1, 1976
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    [Analysis of drug-resistance mutations and treatment of mycoplasma pneumonia in children in Hunan Province in 2023].

    Zhonghua yu fang yi xue za zhi [Chinese journal of preventive medicine]·2024
    Same author

    Patients' Reports of Traumatic Experience and Posttraumatic Stress in Psychiatric Settings.

    East Asian archives of psychiatry : official journal of the Hong Kong College of Psychiatrists = Dong Ya jing shen ke xue zhi : Xianggang jing shen ke yi xue yuan qi kan·2020
    Same author

    [Study on the relationship between HIV drug resistance and CD4(+)T cell counts among antiretroviral therapy patients with low viral load].

    Zhonghua yu fang yi xue za zhi [Chinese journal of preventive medicine]·2018
    Same author

    Validation of the Hong Kong Cantonese Version of World Health Organization Five Well-Being Index for People with Severe Mental Illness.

    East Asian archives of psychiatry : official journal of the Hong Kong College of Psychiatrists = Dong Ya jing shen ke xue zhi : Xianggang jing shen ke yi xue yuan qi kan·2016
    Same author

    A study on the demographic impact of an IUD programme.

    Population studies·2011
    Same author

    Family planning in Taiwan, Republic of China: Progress and prospects.

    Population studies·2011

    Repeatedly using the randomized response technique (RRT) improves survey efficiency. A study found this multiple-trial RRT is feasible for sensitive topics, even with repeated questions.

    Area of Science:

    • Survey Methodology
    • Statistics
    • Social Science Research

    Background:

    • Theoretical models suggest repeated administration of the two-related-question randomized response technique (RRT) enhances efficiency by reducing estimate variance.
    • Previous examinations assessed RRT's relative efficiency compared to direct questioning across various conditions, including respondent truthfulness and number of trials.
    • Concerns exist that increased respondent focus on anonymity might elevate mean square error.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a multiple-trial randomized response technique (RRT) in a real-world setting.
    • To assess if repeated administration of RRT questions impacts respondent cooperation or survey costs.
    • To determine the practical utility of multiple-trial RRT for sensitive social issues.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Methods:

    • A limited-scope field study was conducted in Taichung, Taiwan.
    • Respondents were administered a multiple-trial RRT, repeating the same set of questions multiple times (up to three trials).
    • Respondent cooperation and feasibility were compared to conventional single-trial RRT.

    Main Results:

    • The multiple-trial RRT model demonstrated feasibility, performing comparably to or better than the conventional single-trial RRT.
    • No significant deterioration in respondent cooperation was observed despite repeated questioning.
    • Potential increases in survey costs and respondent fatigue for up to three trials were deemed negligible.

    Conclusions:

    • The multiple-trial RRT is a feasible and valuable survey method for investigating sensitive social issues.
    • The technique appears robust to repeated administration without compromising respondent engagement.
    • Further extensive field testing across diverse socio-cultural contexts is recommended to generalize findings.