Diagnostic yield and optimal duration of continuous-loop event monitoring for the diagnosis of palpitations. A
P J Zimetbaum1, K Y Kim, M E Josephson
1Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Background:
Continuous-loop event recorders are widely used for the evaluation of palpitations, but the optimal duration of monitoring is unknown.
Objective:
To determine the yield, timing, and incremental cost-effectiveness of each week of event monitoring for palpitations.
Design:
Prospective cohort study.
Patients:
105 consecutive outpatients referred for the placement of a continuous-loop event recorder for the evaluation of palpitations.
Measurements:
Diagnostic yield, incremental cost, and cost-effectiveness for each week of monitoring.
Results:
The diagnostic yield of continuous-loop event recorders was 1.04 diagnoses per patient in week 1, 0.15 diagnoses per patient in week 2, and 0.01 diagnoses per patient in week 3 and beyond. Over time, the cost-effectiveness ratio increased from $98 per new diagnosis in week 1 to $576 per new diagnosis in week 2 and $5832 per new diagnosis in week 3.
Conclusions:
In patients referred for evaluation of palpitations, the diagnostic yield of continuous-loop event recording decreases rapidly after 2 weeks of monitoring. A 2-week monitoring period is reasonably cost-effective for most patients and should be the standard period for continuous-loop event recording for the evaluation of palpitations.
Related Concept Videos
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac muscle...
Electrocardiogram
Three major waveforms are present in a typical ECG recording: the P wave, the QRS complex, and the T...
Holter Monitor: 24-Hour Monitoring
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Dysrhythmias VII: Nursing Management of Dysrhythmias


