Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cloning differentially expressed mRNAs

J S Wan1, S J Sharp, G M Poirier

  • 1R. W. Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Institute, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.

Nature Biotechnology
|December 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Development and reliability and validity testing of the questionnaire on rotavirus vaccination behavioral and social drivers].

Zhonghua yu fang yi xue za zhi [Chinese journal of preventive medicine]·2025
Same author

Diversity of electrocardiographic patterns in left main culprit acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

American heart journal·2025
Same author

Is a 14-day Pathway From Decision to Treat to Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer Patients Feasible in the National Health Service? The Torbay Experience 5 Years On.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2023
Same author

Re: A bump in the night: a 15-year retrospective analysis of urgent inpatient and emergency CT reporting out of hours in a tertiary referral centre.

Clinical radiology·2022
Same author

Re: CT coronary angiography-guided cardiovascular risk screening in asymptomatic patients: is it time?

Clinical radiology·2021
Same author

Serum anti-GM2 and anti-GalNAc-GD1a IgG antibodies are biomarkers for acute canine polyradiculoneuritis.

The Journal of small animal practice·2021
Same journal

Author Correction: Improved RNA base editing with guide RNAs mimicking highly edited endogenous ADAR substrates.

Nature biotechnology·2026
Same journal

Unlocking the chemical potential of filamentous fungi using prime editing.

Nature biotechnology·2026
Same journal

A genome-scale CRISPRi perturbation atlas of human induced pluripotent stem cells.

Nature biotechnology·2026
Same journal

Prime editing for precise genome engineering and modulation of fungal metabolism.

Nature biotechnology·2026
Same journal

Retargeted serine integrases for one-step, precise integration of large DNA sequences in human cells.

Nature biotechnology·2026
Same journal

A retargeted recombinase for precise insertion of large DNA.

Nature biotechnology·2026
See all related articles

Differential gene expression analysis using electronic subtraction (ES), subtractive hybridization (SH), and differential display (DD) methods was compared. Differential display (DD) is the preferred method for identifying differentially expressed mRNAs, regardless of abundance.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genomics
  • Gene Expression Analysis

Background:

  • Differential gene expression is crucial in biological processes like development and injury.
  • Current methods for identifying differentially expressed genes, such as electronic subtraction (ES), subtractive hybridization (SH), and differential display (DD), lack rigorous quantitative comparison.
  • The quantitative aspects of these gene expression analysis techniques remain largely speculative.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantitatively compare the efficacy of electronic subtraction (ES), subtractive hybridization (SH), and differential display (DD) for identifying differentially expressed mRNAs.
  • To determine the optimal method for comprehensive gene expression profiling.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of three distinct methods for detecting differential gene expression: electronic subtraction (ES), subtractive hybridization (SH), and differential display (DD).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Application of these methods to HeLa cells treated with interferon-gamma to identify differentially expressed mRNAs.
  • Analysis of data generated by each method, focusing on the number of unique mRNAs identified, redundancy, and dependence on mRNA abundance or primers.

    • Main Results:

    • Electronic subtraction (ES) identified only seven abundant mRNAs, yielding digital, reusable data but missing rare transcripts.
    • Subtractive hybridization (SH) identified 33 unique mRNAs with redundancy dependent on mRNA abundance.
    • Differential display (DD) identified 23 unique mRNAs, demonstrating redundancy dependent on primers, and is independent of mRNA prevalence.

    Conclusions:

    • Differential display (DD) is the method of choice for identifying differentially expressed mRNAs due to its ability to detect both abundant and rare transcripts.
    • DD requires minimal RNA input, simultaneously detects mRNA increases and decreases, and provides rapid results.
    • The study highlights DD's superiority in comprehensive gene expression analysis compared to ES and SH.