Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Depolarizing the perceptual magnet effect

A J Lotto1, K R Kluender, L L Holt

  • 1Department of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago, Illinois 60626, USA. alotto@luc.edu

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|June 24, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Informational masking influences segmental and suprasegmental speech categorization.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2023
Same author

Articulatory Gain Predicts Motor Cortex and Subthalamic Nucleus Activity During Speech.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2021
Same author

Simultaneously recorded subthalamic and cortical LFPs reveal different lexicality effects during reading aloud.

Journal of neurolinguistics·2021
Same author

End of life customs among immigrants from Eritrea.

Journal of transcultural nursing : official journal of the Transcultural Nursing Society·2002
Same author

Influence of fundamental frequency on stop-consonant voicing perception: a case of learned covariation or auditory enhancement?

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2001
Same author

General auditory processes contribute to perceptual accommodation of coarticulation.

Phonetica·2000
Same journal

High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) alters active and diurnal calling amid vessel noise in New York City.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Experimental noise characterisation of phase-locked tandem-rotor in edgewise flight.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The tune-text-temporal synergy: Prosodic effects of final segmental weakening in Neapolitan.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Monitoring vessel movement above critical offshore infrastructure using distributed acoustic sensing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

The Perceptual-Magnet Effect (PME) may not be a distinct phenomenon. Our findings suggest that speech sound perception is explained by general principles of categorical perception, not special magnet effects.

Area of Science:

  • Psycholinguistics
  • Speech Perception
  • Auditory Neuroscience

Background:

  • The Perceptual-Magnet Effect (PME) is a proposed phenomenon where speech sound perception within a category is influenced by phonetic "goodness."
  • Existing studies often use AX-discrimination tasks, but category membership is determined by isolated sound identification, potentially confounding results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether the Perceptual-Magnet Effect (PME) is a necessary explanation for speech sound perception.
  • To determine if classic Categorical Perception tenets can account for observed discriminability patterns.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Assessed identification and goodness judgments of vowel pairs (/i/-/e/) within varying contexts.
  • Experiment 2: Conducted AX-discrimination tasks using the same vowel pairs.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Calculated predictions of discriminability based on contextual identification functions from Experiment 1.

    • Main Results:

    • Phonetic identity of vowels shifted significantly based on the context vowel.
    • Discriminability functions obtained in Experiment 2 were accurately predicted by the identification functions from Experiment 1.
    • No unexplained variance necessitated the proposal of "perceptual magnets."

    Conclusions:

    • The Perceptual-Magnet Effect (PME) may not require unique explanatory mechanisms beyond general Categorical Perception.
    • Observed effects in speech sound discrimination can be explained by established principles of how listeners categorize stimuli.
    • Discriminability is consistently greater for cross-category stimulus pairs than for within-category pairs.