Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Telescopic prostheses for implants

H W Preiskel1, P Tsolka

  • 1United Medical School of Guy's, London, United Kingdom.

The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
|June 25, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Breakaway forces of flat and domed surfaced Magfit implant magnet attachments.

The European journal of prosthodontics and restorative dentistry·2007
Same author

The DIA anatomic abutment system and telescopic prostheses: a clinical report.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·1997
Same author

The implant in prosthodontics today--a personal viewpoint.

British dental journal·1997
Same author

Occlusal variables, bruxism and temporomandibular disorders: a clinical and kinesiographic assessment.

Journal of oral rehabilitation·1995
Same author

Treatment outcomes in implant therapy: the influence of surgical and prosthodontic experience.

The International journal of prosthodontics·1995
Same author

A controlled clinical, electromyographic, and kinesiographic assessment of craniomandibular disorders in women.

Journal of orofacial pain·1994
Same journal

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Different Types of İmplant- Supported Prostheses: A Retrospective Study.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2026
Same journal

Soft Tissue Dehiscence and Survival of Customized CAD/CAM Titanium Subperiosteal Implants: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2026
Same journal

Rotational Load Fatigue Performance of Implants with Cylindrical and Conical Internal Cam-Groove Connections.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2026
Same journal

Robot-Assisted Zygomatic Implant Placement for Hemimaxillectomy Defect Reconstruction: A Case Series.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2026
Same journal

7-mm-Diameter Versus 5-mm-Diameter Immediate Post-Extraction Implants in the Molar Region: 1-Year Results from a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2026
Same journal

Artificial Intelligence, the Dunning-Kruger Effect, and Implant Treatment Planning.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2026
See all related articles

This study on telescopic implant-supported fixed prostheses found a low complication rate. Cement-retained designs with distal extensions needed more maintenance, suggesting screw-retained options warrant further investigation.

Area of Science:

  • Dental Implantology
  • Prosthodontics

Background:

  • Telescopic implant-supported fixed prostheses are a treatment option for missing teeth.
  • Understanding the long-term outcomes and complication rates is crucial for clinical decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the clinical outcomes and complication rates of telescopic implant-supported fixed prostheses.
  • To compare outcomes between cement-retained and screw-retained designs.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 73 telescopic implant-supported fixed prostheses.
  • Categorization into cement-retained (54) and screw-retained (19) groups.
  • Assessment of complication rates and postoperative maintenance requirements.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Overall complication rate was low, with most complications being minor.
  • Cement-retained prostheses with distal cantilevered extensions required significantly more postoperative maintenance.
  • Screw-retained prostheses demonstrated no complications and ease of retrievability.

Conclusions:

  • Telescopic implant-supported fixed prostheses generally exhibit favorable outcomes with low complication rates.
  • Cement-retained designs with distal extensions may necessitate increased maintenance.
  • Combined screw- and cement-retained prostheses show promise for reduced complications and improved retrievability, meriting further research.