Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

A Recovery Cardiopulmonary Bypass Model Without Transfusion or Inotropic Agents in Rats
Published on: March 23, 2018
The effects of haemofiltration on cefazolin levels during cardiopulmonary bypass
J J O'Rullian1, R K Wise, R M McCoach
1College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, USA.
Insights
Ultrafiltration during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) does not significantly alter cefazolin antibiotic levels, suggesting it does not increase sternal wound infection risk. Routine CPB procedures with ultrafiltration are safe regarding antibiotic efficacy.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Pharmacology
- Infectious Disease
Background:
- Ultrafiltration (UF) during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) can alter drug concentrations.
- Sternal wound infections are a concern following cardiac surgery.
- The impact of UF on antibiotic levels and infection risk requires clarification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effect of ultrafiltration on cefazolin concentrations during CPB.
- To determine if ultrafiltration increases the risk of sternal wound infections.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study of cefazolin levels during routine CPB with and without ultrafiltration.
- Measurement of antibiotic concentrations at three time intervals.
- Comparison with a control group not undergoing ultrafiltration.
Main Results:
- Minimal difference observed in the rate of cefazolin level decay with or without ultrafiltration.
- Ultrafiltration via a haemoconcentrator did not significantly impact antibiotic pharmacokinetics.
- No increased risk for infection was indicated by antibiotic levels.
Conclusions:
- Ultrafiltration during CPB does not appear to compromise cefazolin levels.
- The use of ultrafiltration in CPB is unlikely to increase the risk of sternal wound infections.
- Standard institutional practices are sufficient; additional infection control measures are not necessitated by UF use.
Abstract:
Ultrafiltration has been shown to affect cardiac drug concentrations during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), based on their respective pharmacological properties. In an attempt to understand the aetiology of sternal wound infections, a study was performed to eliminate the use of ultrafiltration as a possible cause. We compared cefazolin levels at three time intervals during the course of routine CPB with ultrafiltration to those levels in a control group in which ultrafiltration was not used. Our results indicate that there is little difference in the rate of decay of antibiotic levels with or without the use of a haemoconcentrator. This implies that ultrafiltration procedures do not put the patient at any increased risk for infection and that additional measures beyond that which we would normally use at our institution need not be taken.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Steady-State, Minimum and Maximum Concentrations
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Drug Dosing and Hepatic Blood Flow
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Hemoperfusion and Hemofiltration
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

