Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Detecting errors in a scoring program: a method of double diagnosis using a computer-generated sample

S C Marcus1, L N Robins

  • 1Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA 15213, USA. smarcus@pitt.edu

Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
|June 26, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparing the national economic burden of five chronic conditions.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2002
Same author

Datapoints: trends in psychiatric practice, 1988-1998: III. Activities and work settings.

Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)·2001
Same author

Datapoints: Trends in psychiatric practice, 1988-1998: II. Caseload and treatment characteristics.

Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)·2001
Same author

Datapoints: Trends in psychiatric practice, 1988-1998: I. Demographic characteristics of practicing psychiatrists.

Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)·2001
Same author

Changes in the length of office visits.

The New England journal of medicine·2001
Same author

Psychiatric care of patients with depression and comorbid substance use disorders.

The Journal of clinical psychiatry·2000
Same journal

Social deprivation in adolescence and risk of depression in young adulthood: a longitudinal analysis of linked administrative data from Northern Ireland.

Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Internalizing and externalizing pathways to adolescent substance use disorders: A Multi-level analysis in Nigerian schools.

Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Prevalence of mental disorders among young people living in urban slums of low- and middle- income countries: A systematic review and Meta-analysis.

Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Natural disasters and suicidality in Australia: a systematic review.

Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Z-topia: Gen Z perspectives on mental health in a changing climate.

Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Generalised anxiety disorder (GAD-7) in Ukrainian sample during wartime.

Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a novel method to find errors in diagnostic scoring programs for clinical interviews. It enhances accuracy by comparing two independently coded programs, improving diagnostic tool reliability.

Area of Science:

  • Computer Science
  • Medical Informatics
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Accurate diagnostic scoring is crucial for structured clinical interviews.
  • Existing methods for validating diagnostic scoring programs have limitations.
  • Ensuring the reliability of computer-based diagnostic tools is essential for clinical practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and evaluate a new method for identifying errors in diagnostic computer scoring programs.
  • To enhance the accuracy and reliability of scoring for the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, version 1.1.
  • To provide a systematic approach for assuring the quality of diagnostic scoring algorithms.

Main Methods:

  • Developed an independent scoring program in a different computer language, adhering to the same diagnostic criteria.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Applied both the original and independent programs to a large dataset of valid, computer-generated test cases.
  • Reviewed discrepancies in diagnostic assignments between the two programs to pinpoint error sources.

    • Main Results:

    • The method successfully identified program steps responsible for scoring errors.
    • Corrections were made to the scoring program, and iterative testing achieved discrepancy-free results.
    • This technique uncovered more errors compared to previously available methods.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed method offers a systematic and rigorous approach to validating diagnostic scoring programs.
    • It enhances the ability to detect and correct errors in computer-based diagnostic tools.
    • This technique contributes to assuring the accuracy of diagnostic scoring based on established algorithms.