Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Casemix funding in Australia

J Braithwaite1, D Hindle, P D Phelan

  • 1School of Health Services Management, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney. j.braithwaite@unsw.edu.au

The Medical Journal of Australia
|June 26, 1998
PubMed
Summary

Australian hospitals use diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) for casemix funding, but evaluations of its impact lack scientific rigor. This debate explores different perspectives on DRG implementation and its future in healthcare policy.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Beyond the surface: a case report of penile tuberculosis as the first sign of miliary disease in a solid organ transplant recipient.

ASM case reports·2026
Same author

An operating system for executing applications on quantum network nodes.

Nature·2025
Same author

Qubit teleportation between non-neighbouring nodes in a quantum network.

Nature·2022
Same author

The scope for adaptive capacity in emergency departments: modelling performance constraints using control task analysis and social organisational cooperation analysis.

Ergonomics·2021
Same author

Realization of a multinode quantum network of remote solid-state qubits.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2021
Same author

Orbital and Spin Dynamics of Single Neutrally-Charged Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers in Diamond.

Physical review letters·2020

Area of Science:

  • Health economics
  • Healthcare management
  • Public health policy

Background:

  • Casemix funding, utilizing diagnosis-related groups (DRGs), was implemented in Australia five years ago.
  • Implementation varies across Australian States, with Victoria and South Australia adopting it broadly.
  • Previous impact evaluations have not met scientific standards for controlling confounding factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine the implementation and impact of casemix funding in Australian hospitals.
  • To stimulate policy debate regarding the future of diagnosis-related groups in healthcare.
  • To incorporate diverse perspectives, including critical viewpoints, defenses, and calls for consumer input.

Main Methods:

  • This study presents a debate format, featuring critical perspectives and defenses of the casemix funding model.

Related Experiment Videos

  • It synthesizes arguments from various stakeholders to explore policy implications.
  • No new empirical data collection or analysis was conducted; the focus is on discussion and policy review.

    • Main Results:

    • The effectiveness and scientific evaluation of casemix funding remain contentious.
    • Different Australian states have adopted varied approaches to DRG implementation.
    • There is a recognized need for robust evaluation methods and consumer engagement.

    Conclusions:

    • Casemix funding using DRGs is a significant but debated policy in Australian healthcare.
    • Further rigorous evaluation and consideration of consumer perspectives are crucial for its future.
    • The debate highlights the complexity of healthcare financing and policy implementation.