Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Assessing Burrowing, Nest Construction, and Hoarding in Mice
Published on: January 5, 2012
The energetic cost of begging behaviour in nestling house wrens
Insights
The energetic cost of begging in nestling house wrens is minimal, accounting for a small fraction of their daily energy budget. This suggests begging
Area of Science:
- Animal Behavior
- Ecology
- Physiology
Background:
- Nestling birds signal need through begging behaviors.
- The energetic cost of begging is hypothesized to influence signaling intensity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the energy expenditure of begging in nestling house wrens (Troglodytes aedon).
- To determine the proportion of daily energy budgets allocated to begging versus other activities.
Main Methods:
- Open-circuit respirometry was used to measure metabolic rates during rest, begging, and non-begging activities.
- Behavioral time budgets were analyzed from videotapes.
- Data on growth rates were incorporated to calculate daily energy budgets.
Main Results:
- Begging increased metabolism by 27% above resting rates, but metabolic rate was not linked to begging vigor.
- More vigorous begging involved longer durations, increasing total energy expenditure.
- The cumulative energy allocated to begging was small, ranging from 0.02% to 0.22% of the daily energy budget.
- Non-begging movements consumed a larger proportion of the energy budget (2% to 9%).
- Energy for begging relative to growth was significantly lower (0.05% to 2.3%) than for non-begging activities (5.1% to 96.8%).
Conclusions:
- The energetic cost of begging is unlikely to be a primary factor influencing the communication of need in nestling house wrens.
- Non-energetic factors or other costs associated with begging may play a more significant role in signaling need.
Abstract:
This study presents data relevant to the hypothesis that the energy expenditure associated with begging influences the signalling of need by nestling birds. We used open-circuit respirometry to measure the energy costs of resting, begging and non-begging activities in nestling house wrens, Troglodytes aedon, ranging in age from 1 to 11 days post-hatching. Across all ages, begging caused a 27% increase in metabolism above resting rates. The metabolic rate during begging was not related to begging vigour. However, more vigorous begs were longer and so required a greater total energy expenditure. We analysed videotapes of broods for nestling behavioural time budgets which were combined with the metabolic data and data on growth at different ages to generate daily energy budgets. Over a 24-h period, the cumulative energy allocated to begging was slight, ranging from 0.02% of the energy budget in younger nestlings (3 days old) to 0.22% in older ones (10 days old). In contrast, non-begging movements accounted for 2 and 9% of the daily energy budget of younger and older nestlings, respectively. Relative to daily growth, the energy allocated to begging was equivalent to 0.05% (younger nestlings) and 2.3% (older nestlings) of the energy sequestered in new tissue, whereas the values for non-begging activities were 5.1 and 96.8%, respectively. These results suggest that the energetic cost of begging is not likely to have a substantial role in influencing communication of need by nestlings. Copyright 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Copyright 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.
Related Concept Videos
Mate Choice
Optimal Foraging
Parental Care
Energy Budgets and Reproductive Strategies
Conservation of Declining Populations

