Related Experiment Videos
Considering handedness in studies involving manual control
1Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4243, USA.
Motor Control
|June 30, 1998
Summary
Handedness assessment in motor behavior studies needs improvement. Current methods, like asking a writing hand, are insufficient, impacting neuroscience findings on information processing.
Area of Science:
- Motor behavior research
- Neuroscience
- Human factors
Background:
- Assessing handedness in motor behavior studies is crucial.
- Current methods of self-reporting writing hand are often inadequate.
- Neuroscience indicates handedness influences information processing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review handedness assessment methods in motor behavior research.
- To highlight the inadequacy of simple self-reporting for handedness.
- To recommend improved methodologies for subject selection.
Main Methods:
- Review of recently published studies in motor behavior research.
- Analysis of handedness assessment information provided in publications.
- Comparison of current practices with recommended best practices.
Main Results:
- Most motor behavior studies provide minimal or no information on handedness assessment.
- Simple self-identification of writing hand is a common but insufficient method.
- Significant differences in information processing exist based on handedness.
Conclusions:
- A more rigorous approach to assessing handedness is necessary for motor behavior studies.
- Utilizing validated preference inventories and selecting strongly lateralized subjects is recommended.
- Clear reporting of handedness assessment methodology enhances research validity.