Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in middle-aged patients: a 2- to 6-year follow-up evaluation

Twenty-eight unicompartmental knee arthroplasties performed as an alternative to high tibial osteotomy or tricompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients under 60 years of age were reviewed after 2 to 6 years of follow-up. The patient's age at the time of operation averaged 52 years. Using the Knee Society Score, 90% were rated good or excellent results in terms of function and pain relief. The average flexion angle obtained was 124 degrees, and the average postoperative alignment was 4 degrees of anatomic valgus for varus deformities and 8 degrees for valgus deformities. The average activity level according to the Tegner and Lysholm score slightly improved (preoperative, 2.3; follow-up, 2.7 points). Of the 28 knees, 9 (32%) presented radiolucent lines about the tibial component and two had incomplete radiolucent lines at the bone-cement interface on the femoral side. There was no correlation between activity level and tibial radiolucent lines. Two revisions were performed because of loosening of the femoral component at the prosthesis-cement interface. One was converted to another unicompartmental arthroplasty and the other to a tricompartmental arthroplasty. One tibial component exhibited an asymptomatic slowly progressive radiolucency. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in middle-aged patients yields 2- to 6-year results competitive with osteotomy but inferior to tricompartmental arthroplasty in terms of revision. The specific prosthetic design used in this series appeared to be vulnerable to femoral component loosening possibly because of constrained tibial topography and smooth tapered femoral fixation lugs.