Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Heat and moisture exchangers. Structure and function

A R Wilkes1

  • 1Department of Anaesthetics and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff.

Respiratory Care Clinics of North America
|July 2, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Laboratory evaluation of a novel anaesthesia delivery device.

Anaesthesia·2016
Same author

Vision Amniotic Leak Detector (ALD) to Eliminate Amniotic Fluid Leakage as a Cause of Vaginal Wetness in Pregnancy: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance.

Applied health economics and health policy·2015
Same author

A comparison of fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation through the Ambu ® Aura-i ™, the intubating laryngeal mask airway and the i-gel ™: a manikin study.

Anaesthesia·2015
Same author

Effect of early tracheostomy on resource utilization and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

British journal of anaesthesia·2014
Same author

Using sublingual ultrasound to predict laryngoscopy view.

Anaesthesia·2014
Same author

Bougie-related airway trauma: dangers of the hold-up sign.

Anaesthesia·2014
Same journal

Indirect calorimetry: relevance to patient outcome.

Respiratory care clinics of North America·2006
Same journal

Indirect calorimetry: applications in practice.

Respiratory care clinics of North America·2006
Same journal

Strategies to prevent aspiration-related pneumonia in tube-fed patients.

Respiratory care clinics of North America·2006
Same journal

Feeding the critically ill obese patient: the role of hypocaloric nutrition support.

Respiratory care clinics of North America·2006
Same journal

Nutrition support for the long-term ventilator-dependent patient.

Respiratory care clinics of North America·2006
Same journal

A nutritional strategy to improve oxygenation and decrease morbidity in patients who have acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Respiratory care clinics of North America·2006
See all related articles

Choosing Heat and Moisture Exchangers (HMEs) requires careful consideration of patient needs and device performance. Independent testing is valuable, but comparisons must use consistent protocols to ensure accurate selection of respiratory humidifiers.

Area of Science:

  • Respiratory care and medical device technology.

Background:

  • A wide variety of Heat and Moisture Exchangers (HMEs) exist, designed for diverse clinical applications and patient requirements.
  • Selecting the appropriate HME is complex, influenced by numerous device attributes and patient-specific factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the complexities in selecting Heat and Moisture Exchangers (HMEs) for respiratory care.
  • To emphasize the importance of standardized testing protocols for HME performance evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Review of available Heat and Moisture Exchanger (HME) devices and their performance characteristics.
  • Analysis of factors influencing HME selection in clinical practice.
  • Discussion on the implications of varying test procedures and protocols on HME performance data.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • HME performance varies significantly, making generalized comparisons potentially misleading.
  • Independent HME testing provides useful data, but requires careful interpretation due to differing methodologies.
  • Some patient populations may not benefit from HMEs, necessitating alternative humidification strategies.

Conclusions:

  • Appropriate selection of Heat and Moisture Exchangers (HMEs) depends on individual patient needs and specific clinical contexts.
  • Standardized testing and cautious interpretation of data are crucial for accurate HME comparisons.
  • Alternative humidification devices may be more suitable for certain patient groups.