Microphone and electroglottographic data from dysphonic patients: type 1, 2 and 3 signals

Recently, it has been suggested that statistics which are dependent upon the reliable extraction of a single fundamental period, such as jitter and shimmer, are valid only for nearly periodic signals. This study explored the incidence of nearly periodic and nonperiodic microphone and electroglottographic signals obtained from 202 dysphonic patients. It was found that approximately 42% were type 1 (nearly periodic); approximately 35% were type 2 (containing bifurcations, modulations or subharmonic structure); and approximately 22% were type 3 (chaotic). Discriminating between type 2 and 3 signals was very difficult for 40% of the signals which were ultimately rated type 3. This was due to the brevity of the apparently chaotic segment, and/or the persistence of some harmonic structure within the chaos. Irrespective of that difficulty, the results suggest that there may be a substantial incidence of nontype 1 signals in a given clinical population. It was concluded, therefore, that signal typing is a necessary step in the analyses of microphone and electoglottographic data.