Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Age specific prostate specific antigen reference ranges: population specific

J G Borer1, J Sherman, M C Solomon

  • 1Department of Urology, State University of New York Health Science Center, Brooklyn, USA.

The Journal of Urology
|July 2, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Degenerate Two-Photon Rydberg Atom Voltage Reference.

AVS quantum science·2024
Same author

Hypodermic Injections in the Treatment of Syphilis.

Chicago medical examiner·2023
Same author

Early urodynamic findings after complete primary repair of exstrophy.

Journal of pediatric urology·2023
Same author

Radio-Pathomic Maps of Cell Density Identify Brain Tumor Invasion beyond Traditional MRI-Defined Margins.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2022
Same author

Clinicopathological correlation of the expression of excision repair cross complementation group 1 (ERCC1) in oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas: an immunohistochemical study.

Experimental oncology·2020
Same author

Sustainability in Dentistry: A Multifaceted Approach Needed.

Journal of dental research·2020
Same journal

On the Memoryless Property in Markov Models for NMIBC Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

Multi-institutional Assessment of Performance Metrics for MRI-targeted Transperineal Prostate Biopsy.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

Urinary Supersaturation in a Randomized Trial among Individuals with Recurrent Nephrolithiasis comparing Empiric versus Selective Preventive Therapy: The URINE Trial.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

The FDA Should Allow More BCG Strains into the US Market: How Recent Landmark Trials Expose a Regulatory Paradox.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

Let's Shift the Focus from Death to Life after Fournier's Gangrene.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

Endourology and Nephrolithiasis.

The Journal of urology·2026
See all related articles

Using age-specific prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ranges did not safely reduce prostate biopsies in men aged 60-79. A significant percentage of avoided biopsies in this group revealed undetected cancers with unfavorable histology.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Oncology
  • Medical Diagnostics

Background:

  • Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a key biomarker for prostate cancer detection.
  • Age-specific PSA reference ranges aim to improve diagnostic accuracy by accounting for age-related variations.
  • The utility of age-specific PSA ranges in guiding prostate biopsy decisions in older men requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of using age-specific PSA reference ranges to determine the necessity of prostate biopsy in men aged 60 to 79.
  • To assess the rate of missed prostate cancers, particularly those with unfavorable histology, when relying on age-specific PSA ranges.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of medical records for men aged 60-79 who underwent PSA testing, digital rectal examination, and prostate biopsy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of biopsy outcomes using the standard PSA reference range (0-4.0 ng/mL) versus four different age-specific PSA reference ranges.
  • Analysis of cancer detection rates and histological characteristics of missed cancers.
  • Main Results:

    • Out of 1,280 biopsies, 73 (5.7%) might have been avoided using age-specific ranges.
    • Fifteen of these avoided biopsies (20.5%) revealed undetected prostate cancer, with 60% exhibiting unfavorable histology.
    • Cancer detection rates were higher in Black men compared to White men, but missed cancer rates did not differ significantly by race.

    Conclusions:

    • Age-specific PSA reference ranges did not safely eliminate the need for prostate biopsy in the studied population of men aged 60-79.
    • A substantial proportion of potentially missed cancers had unfavorable histology, underscoring the risk of relying solely on age-specific PSA values.
    • The standard PSA threshold of >4.0 ng/mL remains a critical indicator for prostate biopsy in this age group with a negative digital rectal examination.