Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026
08:24
Conventional and Threshold-Tracking Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Tests for Single-handed Operation
Published on: August 16, 2021
[MESA, TESA, TESE + ICSI: results of the first 50 cases]
Ceska Gynekologie
|July 3, 1998
Summary
Sperm retrieval success rates were higher in men with obstructive azoospermia (100%) compared to testicular azoospermia (48%). These procedures offer hope for infertile men, with successful outcomes including births and ongoing pregnancies.
Area of Science:
- Reproductive Medicine
- Urology
- Andrology
Context:
- Male infertility affects numerous couples worldwide.
- Azoospermia, the absence of sperm in ejaculate, is a significant cause of male infertility.
- Surgical sperm retrieval techniques are crucial for assisted reproductive technologies.
Purpose:
- To evaluate the efficacy of different sperm retrieval techniques in men with azoospermia.
- To compare outcomes between testicular azoospermia and obstructive azoospermia.
- To assess the success rates of microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA), testicular sperm aspiration (TESA), and testicular sperm extraction (TESE).
Summary:
- This study analyzed 47 infertile men undergoing sperm retrieval between 1996 and 1997.
- Sperm was successfully retrieved in 48% of men with testicular azoospermia and 100% of men with obstructive azoospermia.
- Overall, 25.5% of cases resulted in successful outcomes, including births and pregnancies, with higher success rates in obstructive azoospermia (40.9%) compared to testicular azoospermia (12%).
Impact:
- Surgical sperm retrieval provides a viable option for achieving biological parenthood in men with azoospermia.
- Obstructive azoospermia demonstrates a higher likelihood of successful sperm retrieval and subsequent pregnancy.
- The findings support the use of MESA, TESA, and TESE in managing male infertility due to azoospermia.
