Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Muscle patterning and specification in Drosophila

M Ruiz-Gómez1

  • 1Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom. mr10017@hermes.cam.ac.uk

The International Journal of Developmental Biology
|July 8, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A distinct set of founders and fusion-competent myoblasts make visceral muscles in the Drosophila embryo.

Development (Cambridge, England)·2001
Same author

Drosophila dumbfounded: a myoblast attractant essential for fusion.

Cell·2000
Same author

[Type II lissencephaly: presentation of intermediate form].

Revista de neurologia·1998
Same author

Specific muscle identities are regulated by Krüppel during Drosophila embryogenesis.

Development (Cambridge, England)·1997
Same author

groucho and hedgehog regulate engrailed expression in the anterior compartment of the Drosophila wing.

Development (Cambridge, England)·1995
Same author

The helix-loop-helix extramacrochaetae protein is required for proper specification of many cell types in the Drosophila embryo.

Development (Cambridge, England)·1994
Same journal

Spatiotemporal dynamics of lineage-specific epithelial maturation in the developing mouse stomach.

The International journal of developmental biology·2026
Same journal

Dynein axonemal assembly factors (<i>dnaaf</i>) 5 and 9 are expressed in ciliated organs of zebrafish embryos.

The International journal of developmental biology·2026
Same journal

A chloroquine sensitivity gradient induces tissue regeneration and maintenance phenotypes in planarians.

The International journal of developmental biology·2026
Same journal

Sialylated glycoproteins and sialyltransferases involved in mesoderm-derived organ formation during embryogenesis.

The International journal of developmental biology·2026
Same journal

The <i>Hydra</i> FGF family - dispersed across the genome and expressed locally.

The International journal of developmental biology·2026
Same journal

Correction: Inhibition of COX2 impairs angiogenesis and causes vascular defects in developing zebrafish embryos.

The International journal of developmental biology·2025
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Sense organ and muscle development in Drosophila embryogenesis utilize distinct cell generation but similar genetic mechanisms. This suggests conserved genetic control for cell specification and fate decisions in both neural and muscle development.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental biology
  • Cell biology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Sense organs and muscles in Drosophila embryogenesis arise from different cellular processes.
  • Sense organs develop from a single progenitor cell lineage.
  • Muscles form through the fusion of myoblasts from distinct cell populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the genetic control underlying sense organ and muscle development.
  • To compare the mechanisms of cell specification and fate determination in neural and muscle development.
  • To identify shared genetic pathways in distinct developmental processes.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of gene expression patterns.
  • Genetic screens for developmental mutants.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Lineage tracing studies in Drosophila embryos.
  • Main Results:

    • Despite differing cellular origins, similar genes and genetic mechanisms regulate both sense organ and muscle pattern generation.
    • Cell specification for neuronal or muscle development is under conserved genetic control.
    • Alternative fate acquisition among sibling cells shows similar genetic regulation in both contexts.

    Conclusions:

    • Conserved genetic pathways govern cell specification and fate decisions in Drosophila neural and muscle development.
    • Understanding these shared mechanisms provides insights into fundamental principles of developmental biology.
    • This research highlights the intricate interplay between distinct developmental processes and shared genetic regulation.